179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22944007)
1. Fermentation characteristics of resistant starch from maize prepared by the enzymatic method in vitro.
Zhang H; Xu X; Jin Z
Int J Biol Macromol; 2012 Dec; 51(5):1185-8. PubMed ID: 22944007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanism and enzymatic contribution to in vitro test method of digestion for maize starches differing in amylose content.
Brewer LR; Cai L; Shi YC
J Agric Food Chem; 2012 May; 60(17):4379-87. PubMed ID: 22480190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structure and properties of maize starch processed with a combination of α-amylase and pullulanase.
Zhang H; Tian Y; Bai Y; Xu X; Jin Z
Int J Biol Macromol; 2013 Jan; 52():38-44. PubMed ID: 23043758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fermentation of Metroxylon sagu resistant starch type III by Lactobacillus sp. and Bifidobacterium bifidum.
Siew-Wai L; Zi-Ni T; Karim AA; Hani NM; Rosma A
J Agric Food Chem; 2010 Feb; 58(4):2274-8. PubMed ID: 20121195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enzymatic Modification of Corn Starch Influences Human Fecal Fermentation Profiles.
Dura A; Rose DJ; Rosell CM
J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Jun; 65(23):4651-4657. PubMed ID: 28553713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High amylose wheat starch structures display unique fermentability characteristics, microbial community shifts and enzyme degradation profiles.
Bui AT; Williams BA; Hoedt EC; Morrison M; Mikkelsen D; Gidley MJ
Food Funct; 2020 Jun; 11(6):5635-5646. PubMed ID: 32537617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resistant Starch is Actively Fermented by Infant Faecal Microbiota and Increases Microbial Diversity.
Gopalsamy G; Mortimer E; Greenfield P; Bird AR; Young GP; Christophersen CT
Nutrients; 2019 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 31208010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short communication: in vitro ruminal fermentability of a modified corn cultivar expressing a thermotolerant α-amylase.
Hu W; Persia ME; Kung L
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Oct; 93(10):4846-9. PubMed ID: 20855018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resistant starch, fermented resistant starch, and short-chain fatty acids reduce intestinal fat deposition in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Zheng J; Enright F; Keenan M; Finley J; Zhou J; Ye J; Greenway F; Senevirathne RN; Gissendanner CR; Manaois R; Prudente A; King JM; Martin R
J Agric Food Chem; 2010 Apr; 58(8):4744-8. PubMed ID: 20353151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Production and in vitro fermentation of soluble, non-digestible, feruloylated oligo- and polysaccharides from maize and wheat brans.
Yang J; Maldonado-Gómez MX; Hutkins RW; Rose DJ
J Agric Food Chem; 2014 Jan; 62(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 24359228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of maize starch with a slow digestion property using maltogenic α-amylase.
Miao M; Xiong S; Ye F; Jiang B; Cui SW; Zhang T
Carbohydr Polym; 2014 Mar; 103():164-9. PubMed ID: 24528715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effects of three resistant starch preparations on transit time and short-chain fatty acid production in rats.
Ferguson LR; Tasman-Jones C; Englyst H; Harris PJ
Nutr Cancer; 2000; 36(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 10890035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small intestinal malabsorption and colonic fermentation of resistant starch and resistant peptides to short-chain fatty acids.
Nordgaard I; Mortensen PB; Langkilde AM
Nutrition; 1995; 11(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 7544175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feed ingredients differing in fermentable fibre and indigestible protein content affect fermentation metabolites and faecal nitrogen excretion in growing pigs.
Jha R; Leterme P
Animal; 2012 Apr; 6(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 22436276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular rearrangement of starch during in vitro digestion: toward a better understanding of enzyme resistant starch formation in processed starches.
Lopez-Rubio A; Flanagan BM; Shrestha AK; Gidley MJ; Gilbert EP
Biomacromolecules; 2008 Jul; 9(7):1951-8. PubMed ID: 18529077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of different levels and sources of resistant starch on faecal quality of dogs of various body sizes.
Goudez R; Weber M; Biourge V; Nguyen P
Br J Nutr; 2011 Oct; 106 Suppl 1():S211-5. PubMed ID: 22005431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fermentation of starch by Klebsiella oxytoca p2, containing plasmids with alpha-amylase and pullulanase genes.
dos Santos VL; Araújo EF; de Barros EG; Guimarães WV
Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Dec; 65(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 10550774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Starch and fiber fractions in selected food and feed ingredients affect their small intestinal digestibility and fermentability and their large bowel fermentability in vitro in a canine model.
Bednar GE; Patil AR; Murray SM; Grieshop CM; Merchen NR; Fahey GC
J Nutr; 2001 Feb; 131(2):276-86. PubMed ID: 11160546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of dietary resistant starch and protein on colonic fermentation and intestinal tumourigenesis in rats.
Le Leu RK; Brown IL; Hu Y; Morita T; Esterman A; Young GP
Carcinogenesis; 2007 Feb; 28(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 17166881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of alpha-amylase reaction mechanisms on analysis of resistant-starch contents.
Moore SA; Ai Y; Chang F; Jane JL
Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Jan; 115():465-71. PubMed ID: 25439920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]