These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22944315)

  • 21. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I: Single die.
    Chaffee NR; Bailey JH; Sherrard DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 9051599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-dimensional evaluation of extended pour alginate impression materials following variable storage time intervals and conditions.
    Sayed ME; Gangadharappa P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(4):477-486. PubMed ID: 30127200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative evaluation of few physical properties of epoxy resin, resin-modified gypsum and conventional type IV gypsum die materials: an in vitro study.
    Gujjarlapudi MC; Reddy SV; Madineni PK; Ealla KK; Nunna VN; Manne SD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 22430693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of postpouring time on the roughness, compressive strength, and diametric tensile strength of dental stone.
    De Cesero L; Mota EG; Burnett LH; Spohr AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1573-7. PubMed ID: 25258259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dimensional stability of contemporary irreversible hydrocolloids: humidor versus wet tissue storage.
    Erbe C; Ruf S; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 22867808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability and surface roughness of a tissue conditioner material.
    Khaledi A; Borhanihaghighi Z; Vojdani M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 22124041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the accuracy of three removable die systems and two die materials.
    Sivakumar I; Mohan J; Arunachalam KS; Zankari V
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Sep; 21(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 24261103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of time, temperature and humidity on the accuracy of alginate impressions.
    Hussain MW; Chaturvedi S; Naqash TA; Ahmed AR; Das G; Rana MH; Abdelmonem AM
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2020; 32(Suppl 1)(4):S659-S667. PubMed ID: 33754527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of mixing methods on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Azer SS; Kerby RE; Knobloch LA
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):736-44. PubMed ID: 18583014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: Linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Sep; 13(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 15345014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of disinfectants on the properties of dental gypsum, part 2: surface properties.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 12501136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Correct timing of work on a hard plaster of Paris model].
    Franz G
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 Sep; 34(9):694-7. PubMed ID: 292591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD; Sutow EJ; MacSween R
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 1781880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Influence of mercaptan impression storage conditions on linear dimensional changes in improved plaster-stone casts].
    Abrão W; Roselino RB; Campos GM; Roselino RF; Stephano CB
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 2490982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture strength of type IV and type V die stone as a function of time.
    Schwedhelm ER; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Dec; 78(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 9421783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the accuracy of two removable die systems with intact working casts.
    Aramouni P; Millstein P
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):533-9. PubMed ID: 8148023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surface detail reproduction under simulated pulpal pressure: a 3-dimensional optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy evaluation.
    Acar O; Erkut S; Lakshmipathy M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 22867807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin die material using two setting methods.
    Paquette JM; Taniguchi T; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 10709038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.