These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22945734)

  • 41. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
    Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cervical microleakage in composite restorations of primary teeth--in vitro study.
    Casagrande L; Brayner R; Barata JS; de Araujo FB
    J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):627-32. PubMed ID: 16139693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of different application and polymerization techniques on the microleakage of proximal resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Brunton PA; Kassir A; Dashti M; Setcos JC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 14753333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Microleakage and adaptation of Class II packable resin-based composites using incremental or bulk filling techniques.
    Gallo JR; Bates ML; Burgess JO
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 11763932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations.
    Pereira Ade F; Poiate IA; Poiate E; Rodrigues FP; Turbino ML; Miranda WG
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):e17-21. PubMed ID: 22313988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class I and II composite restorations.
    Chan DC; Browning WD; Frazier KB; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 18505216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An In-VitroEvaluation of Microleakage at the Cervical Margin Between two Different Class II Restorative Techniques Using Dye Penetration Method.
    Jawaed NU; Abidi SY; Qazi FU; Ahmed S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Sep; 26(9):748-52. PubMed ID: 27671178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Microleakage of Class II posterior composite restorations with gingival margins placed entirely within dentin.
    Stockton LW; Tsang ST
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2007 Apr; 73(3):255. PubMed ID: 17439712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Siebrecht C; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12670072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Agrawal VS; Parekh VV; Shah NC
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-7. PubMed ID: 22616928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Microleakage of a packable composite associated with different materials.
    Loguercio AD; Bauer JR; Reis A; Rodrigues Filho LE; Busato AL
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 11887513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.