236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22946775)
1. LMA ProSeal(TM) vs. i-Gel(TM) in ventilated children: a randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask.
Gasteiger L; Brimacombe J; Oswald E; Perkhofer D; Tonin A; Keller C; Tiefenthaler W
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Nov; 56(10):1321-4. PubMed ID: 22946775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel.
Gasteiger L; Brimacombe J; Perkhofer D; Kaufmann M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2010 Sep; 65(9):913-6. PubMed ID: 20645948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
Gasteiger L; Ofner S; Stögermüller B; Ziegler B; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade.
Lardner DR; Cox RG; Ewen A; Dickinson D
Can J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 55(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18166745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Xue FS; Mao P; Liu HP; Yang QY; Li CW; He N; Xu YC; Liao X
Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
Shimbori H; Ono K; Miwa T; Morimura N; Noguchi M; Hiroki K
Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children.
Lopez-Gil M; Brimacombe J
Paediatr Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 15(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 15725321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children.
Lee JR; Kim MS; Kim JT; Byon HJ; Park YH; Kim HS; Kim CS
Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 22352745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients.
Li CW; Xue FS; Xu YC; Liu Y; Mao P; Liu KP; Yang QY; Zhang GH; Sun HT
Anesth Analg; 2007 May; 104(5):1195-8, tables of contents. PubMed ID: 17456674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
Timmermann A; Cremer S; Eich C; Kazmaier S; Bräuer A; Graf BM; Russo SG
Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children.
Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Mankoo R; Langen KE; Mandler T
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Feb; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21917058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
Theiler LG; Kleine-Brueggeney M; Kaiser D; Urwyler N; Luyet C; Vogt A; Greif R; Unibe MM
Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Proseal LMA with i-Gel in children under controlled ventilation: a prospective randomised clinical study.
Shiveshi P; Anandaswamy TC
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2022; 72(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 33823205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children.
Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Gordon J; Langen KE; Anderson K
Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 22420717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
