236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22946775)
21. A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
Hohlrieder M; Brimacombe J; Eschertzhuber S; Ulmer H; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2007 Sep; 62(9):913-8. PubMed ID: 17697218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of ProSeal LMA with Supreme LMA in paediatric patients.
Hoşten T; Gürkan Y; Kuş A; Özdamar D; Aksu C; Solak M; Toker K
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Sep; 57(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23809021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Positive pressure ventilation with the size 5 laryngeal mask.
Brimacombe JR
J Clin Anesth; 1997 Mar; 9(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 9075035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Use of the size 3 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Results of a randomized crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway].
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anaesthesist; 2006 Feb; 55(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 16270215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients.
Goldmann K; Jakob C
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 15591332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The ProSeal-LM, a new variant of the laryngeal mask: description and first clinical results].
Füllekrug B; Reissmann H; Pothmann W; Masch T; Schulte am Esch J
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2001 Apr; 36(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11386091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prospective randomized comparison of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-ProSeal for elective surgical interventions.
Genzwuerker HV; Altmayer S; Hinkelbein J; Gernoth C; Viergutz T; Ocker H
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Nov; 51(10):1373-7. PubMed ID: 17944641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients.
Goldmann K; Jakob C
Anesth Analg; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1605-1610. PubMed ID: 15920181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.
Chen MK; Hsu HT; Lu IC; Shih CK; Shen YC; Tseng KY; Cheng KI
BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway in children: a comparison between two insertion techniques.
Teoh CY; Lim FS
Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Feb; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18184242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients.
Shin WJ; Cheong YS; Yang HS; Nishiyama T
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):598-601. PubMed ID: 19915475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Airway management under general anaesthesia in pigs using the LMA-ProSeal: a pilot study.
Goldmann K; Kalinowski M; Kraft S
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2005 Sep; 32(5):308-13. PubMed ID: 16135212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.
López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients.
Tiefenthaler W; Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Fricke E; Keller C; Kaufmann M
Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 23550791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; von Goedecke A; Keller C; Brimacombe L; Brimacombe M
Anesth Analg; 2004 Nov; 99(5):1560-1563. PubMed ID: 15502065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.
Goyal R; Shukla RN; Kumar G
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 22151106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
