These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22946794)

  • 21. The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice.
    Puurtinen M; Ketola T; Kotiaho JS
    Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 19772439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic variation and covariation in male attractiveness and female mating preferences in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ratterman NL; Rosenthal GG; Carney GE; Jones AG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Jan; 4(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 24212081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evolution of repeated mating in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    House CM; Evans GM; Smiseth PT; Stamper CE; Walling CA; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):2004-14. PubMed ID: 18489722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 17236415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD; Houde A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1317-24. PubMed ID: 17360285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measuring the fitness benefits of male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Edward DA; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2646-53. PubMed ID: 22834761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A model for the evolution of assortative mating.
    de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Female choosiness leads to the evolution of individually distinctive males.
    Thom MD; Dytham C
    Evolution; 2012 Dec; 66(12):3736-42. PubMed ID: 23206132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.
    Simmons LW; García-González F
    Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2580-91. PubMed ID: 18691259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild.
    Qvarnström A; Brommer JE; Gustafsson L
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):84-6. PubMed ID: 16672970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
    Miller CW; Moore AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs.
    Pryke SR; Griffith SC
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1512-21. PubMed ID: 17584244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stabilizing sexual selection for female ornaments in a dance fly.
    Wheeler J; Gwynne DT; Bussière LF
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Jul; 25(7):1233-42. PubMed ID: 22551204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Leader preference in Neoconocephalus ensiger katydids: a female preference for a nonheritable male trait.
    Murphy MA; Gerhardt HC; Schul J
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Dec; 30(12):2222-2229. PubMed ID: 28976614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis.
    Slatyer RA; Mautz BS; Backwell PR; Jennions MD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2012 Feb; 87(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 21545390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; LeBas NR; Puurtinen M; Tomkins JL
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18077055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Runaway sexual selection leads to good genes.
    Chandler CH; Ofria C; Dworkin I
    Evolution; 2013 Jan; 67(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 23289565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The sexual selection continuum.
    Kokko H; Brooks R; McNamara JM; Houston AI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jul; 269(1498):1331-40. PubMed ID: 12079655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
    Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.