184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22947291)
41. Efficacy, safety, and flap dimensions of a new femtosecond laser for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Vryghem JC; Devogelaere T; Stodulka P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 20202543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The effects of mitomycin C on tear function after photorefractive keratectomy: a contralateral comparative study.
Farahi A; Hashemi H; Mehravaran S
J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 23557224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Delayed epithelial healing following photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C treatment.
Kremer I; Ehrenberg M; Levinger S
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 90(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 20456254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Flap relift for retreatment after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.
Santhiago MR; Smadja D; Zaleski K; Espana EM; Armstrong BK; Wilson SE
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):482-7. PubMed ID: 22767166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. LASIK flap buttonhole treated immediately by PRK with mitomycin C.
Kymionis GD; Portaliou DM; Karavitaki AE; Krasia MS; Kontadakis GA; Stratos A; Yoo SH
J Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 26(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 20027989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Thresholds for interface haze formation after thin-flap femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Rocha KM; Kagan R; Smith SD; Krueger RR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 147(6):966-72, 972.e1. PubMed ID: 19327748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: clinical results.
Fadlallah A; Fahed D; Khalil K; Dunia I; Menassa J; El Rami H; Chlela E; Fahed S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1852-7. PubMed ID: 21840678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Incidence, management, and visual outcomes of buttonholed laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
Al-Mezaine HS; Al-Amro SA; Al-Obeidan S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):839-45. PubMed ID: 19393882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A prospective randomized comparison of four femtosecond LASIK flap thicknesses.
Prakash G; Agarwal A; Yadav A; Jacob S; Kumar DA; Agarwal A; Akhtar R
J Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 26(6):392-402. PubMed ID: 20677726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on corneal epithelial healing after photorefractive keratectomy.
Meduri A; Aragona P; Grenga PL; Roszkowska AM
J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 22230058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes.
Cobo-Soriano R; Calvo MA; Beltrán J; Llovet FL; Baviera J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1357-65. PubMed ID: 16105607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Clinical outcomes of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and off-flap epipolis-laser in situ keratomileusis in moderate to high myopia: 12-month follow-up.
Zhang Y; Li T; Li Z; Dai M; Wang Q; Xu C
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35606707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.
Slade SG; Durrie DS; Binder PS
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 19486798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.
Wang Y; Li J; Liu Y; Xie L
J Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 29(8):534-9. PubMed ID: 23909780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Nerve growth factor concentration and implications in photorefractive keratectomy vs laser in situ keratomileusis.
Lee HK; Lee KS; Kim HC; Lee SH; Kim EK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 139(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 15953424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Optical ray tracing-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopic astigmatism.
Schumacher S; Seiler T; Cummings A; Maus M; Mrochen M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 22033124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of LASEK and LASIK with thin and ultrathin flaps after excimer laser ablation with the SCHWIND Aspheric ablation profile.
Arbelaez MC; Vidal C; Arba Mosquera S
J Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 27(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 20438023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.
Moshirfar M; Schliesser JA; Chang JC; Oberg TJ; Mifflin MD; Townley R; Livingston MK; Kurz CJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye parameters after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.
Huang JC; Sun CC; Chang CK; Ma DH; Lin YF
J Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 28(9):625-31. PubMed ID: 22947290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
