These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22947633)

  • 1. The lurking snake in the grass: interference of snake stimuli in visually taxing conditions.
    Soares SC
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Apr; 10(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 22947633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Lundqvist D; Ohman A
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1032-42. PubMed ID: 19695561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Snake pictures draw more early attention than spider pictures in non-phobic women: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Van Strien JW; Eijlers R; Franken IH; Huijding J
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 96():150-7. PubMed ID: 24374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Hidden Snake in the Grass: Superior Detection of Snakes in Challenging Attentional Conditions.
    Soares SC; Lindström B; Esteves F; Ohman A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114724. PubMed ID: 25493937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task.
    Lipp OV; Derakshan N
    Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 16187873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass.
    Ohman A; Flykt A; Esteves F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Sep; 130(3):466-78. PubMed ID: 11561921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive reappraisal of snake and spider pictures: An event-related potentials study.
    Langeslag SJE; van Strien JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():1-8. PubMed ID: 29859220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) quickly detect snakes but not spiders: Evolutionary origins of fear-relevant animals.
    Kawai N; Koda H
    J Comp Psychol; 2016 Aug; 130(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27078076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spiders do not evoke greater early posterior negativity in the event-related potential as snakes.
    He H; Kubo K; Kawai N
    Neuroreport; 2014 Sep; 25(13):1049-53. PubMed ID: 25026534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of animal fear on attentional capture by fear-relevant animal stimuli in children.
    Waters AM; Lipp OV
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Jan; 46(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 18093573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. We prefer what we fear: A response preference bias mimics attentional capture in spider fear.
    Haberkamp A; Biafora M; Schmidt T; Weiß K
    J Anxiety Disord; 2018 Jan; 53():30-38. PubMed ID: 29156434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A glimpse of fear: Fast detection of threatening targets in visual search with brief stimulus durations.
    Soares SC; Esteves F
    Psych J; 2013 Apr; 2(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26272860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Snakes and cats in the flower bed: fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals.
    Lipp OV; Derakshan N; Waters AM; Logies S
    Emotion; 2004 Sep; 4(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 15456393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search with biological threat stimuli: accuracy, reaction times, and heart rate changes.
    Flykt A
    Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 16187870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fear-related pictures deteriorate the performance of university students with high fear of snakes or spiders.
    Okon-Singer H; Alyagon U; Kofman O; Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Stress; 2011 Mar; 14(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 21034301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the snake-detection hypothesis: larger early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes than to pictures of other reptiles, spiders and slugs.
    Van Strien JW; Franken IH; Huijding J
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():691. PubMed ID: 25237303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In the grip of fear: dissociations in attentional processing of animal fearful individuals.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Lundqvist D
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Feb; 56(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 25400268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valence.
    Purkis HM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 17516810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Unconscious anxiety": phobic responses to masked stimuli.
    Ohman A; Soares JJ
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1994 May; 103(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 8040492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Of snakes and flowers: does preferential detection of pictures of fear-relevant animals in visual search reflect on fear-relevance?
    Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 16768561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.