These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22947633)

  • 21. Exogenous attention to fear: Differential behavioral and neural responses to snakes and spiders.
    Soares SC; Kessel D; Hernández-Lorca M; García-Rubio MJ; Rodrigues P; Gomes N; Carretié L
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():139-147. PubMed ID: 28279668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fear, but not fear-relevance, modulates reaction times in visual search with animal distractors.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Flykt A
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Jan; 23(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18565724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes and spiders: effects of proximity.
    Beligiannis N; Van Strien JW
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Dec; 238(12):2795-2804. PubMed ID: 33009915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The detection of fear-relevant stimuli: are guns noticed as quickly as snakes?
    Fox E; Griggs L; Mouchlianitis E
    Emotion; 2007 Nov; 7(4):691-6. PubMed ID: 18039035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rapid visuomotor processing of phobic images in spider- and snake-fearful participants.
    Haberkamp A; Schmidt F; Schmidt T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Oct; 144(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 23920405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual features and perceptual context modulate attention towards evolutionarily relevant threatening stimuli: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Grassini S; Railo H; Valli K; Revonsuo A; Koivisto M
    Emotion; 2019 Mar; 19(2):348-364. PubMed ID: 29578746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Both low and high spatial frequencies drive the early posterior negativity in response to snake stimuli.
    Beligiannis N; Hermus M; Gootjes L; Van Strien JW
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Dec; 177():108403. PubMed ID: 36332696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preparedness for action: responding to the snake in the grass.
    Flykt A
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 16550854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. But what about the Empress of Racnoss? The allocation of attention to spiders and Doctor Who in a visual search task is predicted by fear and expertise.
    Purkis HM; Lester KJ; Field AP
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1484-8. PubMed ID: 21707142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attention bias modification in specific fears: Spiders versus snakes.
    Luo X; Ikani N; Barth A; Rengers L; Becker E; Rinck M
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Dec; 49(Pt A):30-6. PubMed ID: 25958822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Moving spiders do not boost visual search in spider fear.
    Becker M; Troje NF; Schmidt F; Haberkamp A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):19006. PubMed ID: 39152224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fear makes you stronger: responding to feared animal targets in visual search.
    Flykt A; Lindeberg S; Derakshan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1437-45. PubMed ID: 22744740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Who is afraid of the invisible snake? Subjective visual awareness modulates posterior brain activity for evolutionarily threatening stimuli.
    Grassini S; Holm SK; Railo H; Koivisto M
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):53-61. PubMed ID: 27760371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preattentive processing, preparedness and phobias: effects of instruction on conditioned electrodermal responses to masked and non-masked fear-relevant stimuli.
    Soares JJ; Ohman A
    Behav Res Ther; 1993 Jan; 31(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 8417731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Increased attention to snake images in cynomolgus monkeys: an eye-tracking study.
    Zhang B; Zhou ZG; Zhou Y; Chen YC
    Zool Res; 2020 Jan; 41(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 31709783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of fear and expectancies in capture of covert attention by spiders.
    Devue C; Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2011 Aug; 11(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 21604868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preattentive bias for snake words in snake phobia?
    Wikström J; Lundh LG; Westerlund J; Högman L
    Behav Res Ther; 2004 Aug; 42(8):949-70. PubMed ID: 15178468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implicit associations for fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears.
    Teachman BA; Gregg AP; Woody SR
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2001 May; 110(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 11358017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: how specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli?
    Blanchette I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Aug; 59(8):1484-504. PubMed ID: 16846972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.