These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22948133)
1. Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment. Kliemann LM; Silva M; Reinheimer M; Rivoire WA; Capp E; Dos Reis R Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):342-6. PubMed ID: 22948133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens. An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses. Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy. Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study. Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients. Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins. Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement. Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision. Giacalone PL; Laffargue F; Aligier N; Roger P; Combecal J; Daures JP Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 10600289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laser conization assisted by crypt visualization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Bandieramonte G; Lomonico S; Quattrone P; Stefanon B; Merola M; Bucci A Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 91(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 9469287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease? Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer. Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques. Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia. Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of endocervical margin and high-risk human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Kong TW; Son JH; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Ryu HS Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25284039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens. Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]