159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22948133)
1. Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment.
Kliemann LM; Silva M; Reinheimer M; Rivoire WA; Capp E; Dos Reis R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):342-6. PubMed ID: 22948133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision.
Giacalone PL; Laffargue F; Aligier N; Roger P; Combecal J; Daures JP
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 10600289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laser conization assisted by crypt visualization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Bandieramonte G; Lomonico S; Quattrone P; Stefanon B; Merola M; Bucci A
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 91(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 9469287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of endocervical margin and high-risk human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kong TW; Son JH; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Ryu HS
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25284039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
