These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22948680)

  • 1. Critics of US House proposal to ax AHRQ say idea is penny-wise and pound-foolish.
    Mitka M
    JAMA; 2012 Sep; 308(9):849-50. PubMed ID: 22948680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical lobby seeks cuts in US health research agency.
    Appel A
    Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6548):379. PubMed ID: 7566107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science and the stiumulus. Medicine under the microscope.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1183-5. PubMed ID: 19965447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Penny wise but pound foolish.
    Young W
    Cent Nerv Syst Trauma; 1985; 2(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 4092237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: new challenges, new opportunities.
    Eisenberg JM
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Apr; 35(1 Pt 1):xi-xvi. PubMed ID: 10798906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shot in the arm for medical policy body.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6564):386. PubMed ID: 8559233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AHRQ underfunded: advocates. Current funding won't help safety, quality, they say.
    DerGurahian J
    Mod Healthc; 2009 Jan; 39(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 19230086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives. House subcommittee vote signals AHCPR reprieve.
    Strickland D
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1995 Jul; 49(29):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10143805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Friends go to bat for AHRQ.
    Robeznieks A
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Mar; 37(12):18. PubMed ID: 17427629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison analysis. Critics questioning design of effectiveness studies.
    DoBias M
    Mod Healthc; 2009 Feb; 39(8):10. PubMed ID: 19274822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health agency avoids Congress's axe.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6582):457. PubMed ID: 8632808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomedical research. Panel votes to end prevention fund, cut economics studies, freeze NIH.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2012 Jul; 337(6093):399. PubMed ID: 22837500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shattuck Lecture--In the public interest.
    Copper T
    N Engl J Med; 1979 May; 300(21):1185-8. PubMed ID: 107452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AHCPR and the changing politics of health services research.
    Gray BH; Gusmano MK; Collins SR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2003; Suppl Web Exclusives():W3-283-307. PubMed ID: 14527262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An overview of the HHS budget proposal.
    Rubin RJ
    J Med Pract Manage; 2005; 20(6):288-9. PubMed ID: 16149203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Creative license. As AHRQ struggles with flat funding levels, the agency has been forced to use novel approaches with its research grants.
    Robeznieks A
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(18):28-30. PubMed ID: 17511313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A push for comparative effectiveness: US initiatives aim to empower patients, physicians. Interview by Bridget M. Kuehn.
    Clancy CM
    JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(15):1570-1. PubMed ID: 22511672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Future of AHCPR threatened.
    Puetz BE
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):163. PubMed ID: 7578294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Healthcare Reform: Delivery Reform.
    Raduege TJ;
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2015 Dec; ():1-82. PubMed ID: 27116776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Securing successful funding for nursing research through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
    Edwardson SR
    Nurs Econ; 2006; 24(3):160-1. PubMed ID: 16786832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.