These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22949123)
1. Influence of computer navigation on TKA revision rates. Schnurr C; Güdden I; Eysel P; König DP Int Orthop; 2012 Nov; 36(11):2255-60. PubMed ID: 22949123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Population-based Survivorship of Computer-navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. Antonios JK; Kang HP; Robertson D; Oakes DA; Lieberman JR; Heckmann ND J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Oct; 28(20):857-864. PubMed ID: 31934926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced postoperative morbidity in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective comparison of 225,123 cases. Webb ML; Hutchison CE; Sloan M; Scanlon CM; Lee GC; Sheth NP Knee; 2021 Jun; 30():148-156. PubMed ID: 33930702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. de Steiger RN; Liu YL; Graves SE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Apr; 97(8):635-42. PubMed ID: 25878307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long-Term Results of Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasties Performed by Low-Volume and Less Experienced Surgeon]. Lacko M; Schreierová D; Čellár R; Vaško G Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(3):219-225. PubMed ID: 30257783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Large a Study Is Needed to Detect TKA Revision Rate Reductions Attributable to Robotic or Navigated Technologies? A Simulation-based Power Analysis. Hickey MD; Anglin C; Masri B; Hodgson AJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2350-2361. PubMed ID: 34351313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 29389753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Image-Derived Instrumentation on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates: An Analysis of 83,823 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. McAuliffe MJ; Beer BR; Hatch JJ; Crawford RW; Cuthbert AR; Donnelly WJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Apr; 101(7):580-588. PubMed ID: 30946191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical, radiological and survivorship results after ten years comparing navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-pair analysis. Baier C; Wolfsteiner J; Otto F; Zeman F; Renkawitz T; Springorum HR; Maderbacher G; Grifka J Int Orthop; 2017 Oct; 41(10):2037-2044. PubMed ID: 28550426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does Computer Assisted Navigation Improve Functional Outcomes and Implant Survivability after Total Knee Arthroplasty? Roberts TD; Clatworthy MG; Frampton CM; Young SW J Arthroplasty; 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):59-63. PubMed ID: 26138516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Navigated vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference in the Rate of Respiratory Complications and Transfusions? Liodakis E; Antoniou J; Zukor DJ; Huk OL; Epure LM; Bergeron SG J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2273-7. PubMed ID: 27133926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty: Rates of Adoption and Early Complications. Gholson JJ; Duchman KR; Otero JE; Pugely AJ; Gao Y; Callaghan JJ J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2113-2119. PubMed ID: 28366310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty achieves better postoperative alignment compared to conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in a low-volume setting. Suero EM; Lueke U; Stuebig T; Hawi N; Krettek C; Liodakis E Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 104(7):971-975. PubMed ID: 29704634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review. Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Clinical Outcome of Computer-Navigated Compared with Conventional Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Study. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jun; 99(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28632587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imageless Computer Navigation Reduces 5-Year All-Cause Revision Rates After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Varshneya K; Hong CS; Tyagi V; Ruberte Thiele RA; Huddleston JI J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S211-S215. PubMed ID: 35256233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Computer-Navigated and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Rhee SJ; Kim HJ; Lee CR; Kim CW; Gwak HC; Kim JH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Oct; 101(20):1875-1885. PubMed ID: 31626013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]