These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22949124)
1. New method for measuring acetabular component positioning with EOS imaging: feasibility study on dry bone. Journé A; Sadaka J; Bélicourt C; Sautet A Int Orthop; 2012 Nov; 36(11):2205-9. PubMed ID: 22949124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA. Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem. Kosiyatrakul A; Luenam S; Chotanaphuti T J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S128-33. PubMed ID: 20120674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice? Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reliability of the anterior pelvic plane for computer navigated acetabular component placement during total hip arthroplasty: prospective study with the EOS imaging system. Barbier O; Skalli W; Mainard L; Mainard D; Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Oct; 100(6 Suppl):S287-91. PubMed ID: 25129705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol. Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial. Takada R; Jinno T; Miyatake K; Hirao M; Yagishita K; Yoshii T; Okawa A Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):915-922. PubMed ID: 31204181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography. Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation: which factors influence resultant cup orientation? Grammatopoulos G; Pandit HG; da Assunção R; McLardy-Smith P; De Smet KA; Gill HS; Murray DW Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1290-7. PubMed ID: 25274911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of Pelvic Tilt and Pelvic Rotation in Cup Measurement after THA - An Experimental Study. Schwarz TJ; Weber M; Dornia C; Worlicek M; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Craiovan B Rofo; 2017 Sep; 189(9):864-873. PubMed ID: 28697529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new method of measuring acetabular cup anteversion on simulated radiographs. Bachhal V; Jindal N; Saini G; Sament R; Kumar V; Chouhan D; Dhillon M Int Orthop; 2012 Sep; 36(9):1813-8. PubMed ID: 22648556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach? Rathod PA; Bhalla S; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1877-85. PubMed ID: 24549773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation. Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum. Ha YC; Yoo JJ; Lee YK; Kim JY; Koo KH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3515-23. PubMed ID: 22777589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty between the Direct Lateral Approach and Posterior Lateral Approach with EOS 2D/3D X-Ray Imaging System. Xie R; Huang J; Wu Q; Qian YF; Jiang D; Li L; Huang L Orthop Surg; 2023 May; 15(5):1312-1324. PubMed ID: 37076774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs. Lee GC; Lee SH; Kang SW; Park HS; Jo S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):586. PubMed ID: 31805912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Conventional cup navigation with 2D fluoroscopy in THA: accurate cup positioning respecting pelvic tilt]. Pichl J; Kremer M; Hoffmann R Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Oct; 149(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 21480171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standing radiological analysis with a low-dose biplanar imaging system (EOS system) of the position of the components in total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach: a cohort study of 102 patients. Morvan A; Moreau S; Combourieu B; Pansard E; Marmorat JL; Carlier R; Judet T; Lonjon G Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 26920957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigating the reaming of the acetabular cavity in total hip arthroplasty: does it improve implantation accuracy? Pagkalos J; Chaudary MI; Davis ET J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1749-52. PubMed ID: 24848781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]