These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22949426)

  • 1. Multiple-choice exams: an obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes.
    Stanger-Hall KF
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(3):294-306. PubMed ID: 22949426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive Difficulty and Format of Exams Predicts Gender and Socioeconomic Gaps in Exam Performance of Students in Introductory Biology Courses.
    Wright CD; Eddy SL; Wenderoth MP; Abshire E; Blankenbiller M; Brownell SE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 27252299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students' reasoning skills.
    Bailey EG; Greenall RF; Tullis MM; Williams KR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250143. PubMed ID: 33886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using assessments to investigate and compare the nature of learning in undergraduate science courses.
    Momsen J; Offerdahl E; Kryjevskaia M; Montplaisir L; Anderson E; Grosz N
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013 Jun; 12(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 23737631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms.
    Eddy SL; Brownell SE; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(3):478-92. PubMed ID: 25185231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association Between Dental Student-Developed Exam Questions and Learning at Higher Cognitive Levels.
    Gonzalez-Cabezas C; Anderson OS; Wright MC; Fontana M
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1295-304. PubMed ID: 26522634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of learning gains associated with independent exam analysis in introductory biology.
    Williams AE; Aguilar-Roca NM; Tsai M; Wong M; Beaupré MM; O'Dowd DK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(4):346-56. PubMed ID: 22135369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class.
    Moravec M; Williams A; Aguilar-Roca N; O'Dowd DK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 21123694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning Introductory Biology: Students' Concept-Building Approaches Predict Transfer on Biology Exams.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Frey RF; Limeri LB; Lemons PP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2022 Dec; 21(4):ar65. PubMed ID: 36112624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verbal final exam in introductory biology yields gains in student content knowledge and longitudinal performance.
    Luckie DB; Rivkin AM; Aubry JR; Marengo BJ; Creech LR; Sweeder RD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):515-29. PubMed ID: 24006399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology.
    Haudek KC; Prevost LB; Moscarella RA; Merrill J; Urban-Lurain M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 22949425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable?
    Cotner S; Ballen CJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189610. PubMed ID: 29281676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of the peer-led team-learning instructional model as a stopgap measure improves student achievement for students opting out of laboratory.
    Snyder JJ; Carter BE; Wiles JR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015 Mar; 14(1):ar2. PubMed ID: 25673354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer led team learning in introductory biology: effects on peer leader critical thinking skills.
    Snyder JJ; Wiles JR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0115084. PubMed ID: 25629311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills.
    Momsen JL; Long TM; Wyse SA; Ebert-May D
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 21123690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Greatest Learning Return on Your Pedagogical Investment: Alignment, Assessment or In-Class Instruction?
    Holt EA; Young C; Keetch J; Larsen S; Mollner B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137446. PubMed ID: 26340659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study.
    Craft JA; Christensen M; Shaw N; Bakon S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Dec; 59():6-11. PubMed ID: 28898728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.
    Leight H; Saunders C; Calkins R; Withers M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 23222835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes.
    Colbert JT; Olson JK; Clough MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17339393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microlearning activities improve student comprehension of difficult concepts and performance in a biochemistry course.
    Nowak G; Speed O; Vuk J
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2023 Jan; 15(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 36898885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.