69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22950589)
1. Recruitment strategies for an osteoporosis clinical trial: analysis of effectiveness.
Heard A; March R; Maguire P; Reilly P; Helmore J; Cameron S; Frampton C; Nicholls G; Gilchrist N
Australas J Ageing; 2012 Sep; 31(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 22950589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective and cost-effective clinical trial recruitment strategies for postmenopausal women in a community-based, primary care setting.
Butt DA; Lock M; Harvey BJ
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 20601159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monitoring recruitment success and cost in a randomized clinical trial.
Perri R; Wollin S; Drolet N; Mai S; Awad M; Feine J
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Sep; 14(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 17024986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recruitment strategies for a clinical trial of community-based water therapy for osteoarthritis.
Davey R; Edwards SM; Cochrane T
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Apr; 53(489):315-7. PubMed ID: 12879833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recruitment strategy cost and impact on minority accrual to a breast cancer prevention trial.
Dew A; Khan S; Babinski C; Michel N; Heffernan M; Stephan S; Jordan N; Jovanovic B; Carney P; Bergan R
Clin Trials; 2013 Apr; 10(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 23321266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of recruitment strategies in a community-based intervention study of HIV-infected persons.
Baigis J; Francis ME; Hoffman M
AIDS Care; 2003 Oct; 15(5):717-28. PubMed ID: 12959823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary prevention of osteoporosis: mass screening scenario or prescreening with questionnaires? An economic perspective.
Richy F; Ethgen O; Bruyere O; Mawet A; Reginster JY
J Bone Miner Res; 2004 Dec; 19(12):1955-60. PubMed ID: 15537437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recruitment methods and costs for a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of chiropractic care for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-site pilot study.
Cambron JA; Dexheimer JM; Chang M; Cramer GD
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2010 Jan; 33(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 20114101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cumulative recruitment experience in two large single-center randomized, controlled clinical trials.
Galbreath AD; Smith B; Wood P; Forkner E; Peters JI
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 May; 29(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 18032118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recruitment challenges and recommendations for adolescent obesity trials.
Nguyen B; McGregor KA; O'Connor J; Shrewsbury VA; Lee A; Steinbeck KS; Hill AJ; Shah S; Kohn MR; Baur LA
J Paediatr Child Health; 2012 Jan; 48(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22250828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening and enrolling subjects in a randomized clinical trial involving implant dentures.
Walton JN; MacEntee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 18548957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recruitment strategies for minority participation: challenges and cost lessons from the POWER interview.
Keyzer JF; Melnikow J; Kuppermann M; Birch S; Kuenneth C; Nuovo J; Azari R; Oto-Kent D; Rooney M
Ethn Dis; 2005; 15(3):395-406. PubMed ID: 16108298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of recruitment methods in an obesity prevention trial for young children.
Robinson JL; Fuerch JH; Winiewicz DD; Salvy SJ; Roemmich JN; Epstein LH
Prev Med; 2007 Jun; 44(6):499-503. PubMed ID: 17475318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of osteoporosis treatment with risedronate.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Felsenberg D; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2003; 23(4):93-105. PubMed ID: 15224498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal Japanese women.
Nagata-Kobayashi S; Shimbo T; Fukui T
J Bone Miner Metab; 2002; 20(6):350-7. PubMed ID: 12434163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone mineral density referral for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a prescreening tool in postmenopausal women from the general population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Marín F; López-Bastida J; Díez-Pérez A; Sacristán JA;
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Mar; 74(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 14708042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recruitment and accrual of women in a placebo-controlled clinical pilot study on manual therapy.
Cambron JA; Hawk C; Evans R; Long CR
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jun; 27(5):299-305. PubMed ID: 15195037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Universal bone densitometry screening combined with alendronate therapy for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is highly cost-effective for elderly women.
Schousboe JT; Ensrud KE; Nyman JA; Melton LJ; Kane RL
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 Oct; 53(10):1697-704. PubMed ID: 16181168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health-economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2004; 24(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mailing strategies and recruitment into an intervention trial of the exercise effect on breast cancer biomarkers.
Tworoger SS; Yasui Y; Ulrich CM; Nakamura H; LaCroix K; Johnston R; McTiernan A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 11815403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
