387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22950804)
1. Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.
Dare N; Shillcock R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 22950804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
Lee CH; Kim K
Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parafoveal processing in reading.
Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
Plummer P; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
Johnson RL; Dunne MD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study.
Hohenstein S; Laubrock J; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1150-70. PubMed ID: 20804291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. See before you jump: full recognition of parafoveal words precedes skips during reading.
Gordon PC; Plummer P; Choi W
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):633-41. PubMed ID: 22686842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter?
Angele B; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1210-20. PubMed ID: 21553996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading.
Kliegl R; Hohenstein S; Yan M; McDonald SA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):581-600. PubMed ID: 22515948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Third and fifth graders' processing of parafoveal information in reading: A study in single-word recognition.
Khelifi R; Sparrow L; Casalis S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():1-17. PubMed ID: 26057197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
