387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22950804)
21. Parafoveal preprocessing in reading revisited: evidence from a novel preview manipulation.
Gagl B; Hawelka S; Richlan F; Schuster S; Hutzler F
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):588-95. PubMed ID: 24041397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Eye movements and parafoveal preview of compound words: does morpheme order matter?
Angele B; Rayner K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):505-26. PubMed ID: 22712548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading.
Luke SG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 30088258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition.
Kennedy A; Pynte J; Ducrot S
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Oct; 55(4):1307-37. PubMed ID: 12420997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading.
Radach R; Inhoff AW; Glover L; Vorstius C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):619-33. PubMed ID: 23394582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Processing the in the parafovea: are articles skipped automatically?
Angele B; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):649-62. PubMed ID: 22799285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
Kennedy A; Pynte J
Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.
Bernard JB; Castet E
Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():44-61. PubMed ID: 30629974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: an eye movement analysis.
Kennedy A; Pynte J; Murray WS; Paul SA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):601-18. PubMed ID: 22643118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reaction time reduction after parafoveal preview in a lexical decision task.
Grieco A; Beretta G; Casco C
Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Aug; 103(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17037638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2.
Kliegl R; Risse S; Laubrock J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1250-5. PubMed ID: 17924820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis.
Hyönä J; Häikiö T
Scand J Psychol; 2005 Dec; 46(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 16277648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
