These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22950838)

  • 1. Processing of syllables during handwriting: effects of graphomotor constraints.
    Sausset S; Lambert E; Olive T; Larocque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1872-9. PubMed ID: 22950838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Syllables as processing units in handwriting production.
    Kandel S; Alvarez CJ; Vallée N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 16478323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: testing the syllable-bigram controversy.
    Kandel S; Peereman R; Grosjacques G; Fayol M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1310-22. PubMed ID: 21500939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations.
    Delattre M; Bonin P; Barry C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1330-40. PubMed ID: 17087587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term repetition priming in spoken and written word production: evidence for a contribution of phonology to handwriting.
    Damian MF; Dorjee D; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 21480749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexibility of orthographic and graphomotor coordination during a handwritten copy task: effect of time pressure.
    Sausset S; Lambert E; Olive T
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():866. PubMed ID: 24319435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 26030628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planning and articulation in incremental word production: syllable-frequency effects in English.
    Cholin J; Dell GS; Levelt WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 21244111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event related potentials reveal differences between morphological (prefixes) and phonological (syllables) processing of words.
    Domínguez A; Alija M; Cuetos F; de Vega M
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 16996688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tip-of-the-tongue states reveal age differences in the syllable frequency effect.
    Farrell MT; Abrams L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):277-85. PubMed ID: 21244118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production.
    Kandel S; Hérault L; Grosjacques G; Lambert E; Fayol M
    Cognition; 2009 Mar; 110(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 19150536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition.
    Carreiras M; Vergara M; Barber H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1803-17. PubMed ID: 16269115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 16569154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Japanese mental syllabary and effects of mora, syllable, bi-mora and word frequencies on Japanese speech production.
    Tamaoka K; Makioka S
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 1):79-112. PubMed ID: 19334417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primitive computations in speech processing.
    Endress AD; Mehler J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2187-209. PubMed ID: 19418378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Hebb repetition effect as a laboratory analogue of novel word learning.
    Szmalec A; Duyck W; Vandierendonck A; Mata AB; Page MP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18785073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Syllabic processing in handwritten word production in German children and adults.
    Hess S; Mousikou P; Verrel J; Schroeder S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Jun; 65():. PubMed ID: 30170765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: comparing monolingual and bilingual infants.
    Mattock K; Polka L; Rvachew S; Krehm M
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jan; 13(1):229-43. PubMed ID: 20121879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vowels, syllables, and letter names: differences between young children's spelling in English and Portuguese.
    Pollo TC; Kessler B; Treiman R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 Oct; 92(2):161-81. PubMed ID: 16214500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning of syllable-object relations by preverbal infants: the role of temporal synchrony and syllable distinctiveness.
    Gogate LJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Mar; 105(3):178-97. PubMed ID: 20004909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.