139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22951224)
1. Self-cleaning, maintenance-free aerosol filter by non-thermal plasma at atmospheric pressure.
Jidenko N; Borra JP
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Oct; 235-236():237-45. PubMed ID: 22951224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the effect of media velocity on filter efficiency and most penetrating particle size of nuclear grade high-efficiency particulate air filters.
Alderman SL; Parsons MS; Hogancamp KU; Waggoner CA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):713-20. PubMed ID: 18726819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fabrication of a multi-walled carbon nanotube-deposited glass fiber air filter for the enhancement of nano and submicron aerosol particle filtration and additional antibacterial efficacy.
Park JH; Yoon KY; Na H; Kim YS; Hwang J; Kim J; Yoon YH
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):4132-8. PubMed ID: 21767869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations.
Li L; Zuo Z; Japuntich DA; Pui DY
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):581-94. PubMed ID: 22752097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride.
Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preparation of airborne Ag/CNT hybrid nanoparticles using an aerosol process and their application to antimicrobial air filtration.
Jung JH; Hwang GB; Lee JE; Bae GN
Langmuir; 2011 Aug; 27(16):10256-64. PubMed ID: 21751779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-certified particulate air-purifying filtering facepiece respirators: evaluation by light scattering photometric and particle number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 22239104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Powered, air-purifying particulate respirator filter penetration by a DOP aerosol.
Martin S; Moyer E; Jensen P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Nov; 3(11):620-30. PubMed ID: 17086666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a double-layered ceramic filter for aerosol filtration at high-temperatures: the filter collection efficiency.
de Freitas NL; Gonçalves JA; Innocentini MD; Coury JR
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):747-56. PubMed ID: 16466854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrostatic charged nanofiber filter for filtering airborne novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and nano-aerosols.
Leung WWF; Sun Q
Sep Purif Technol; 2020 Nov; 250():116886. PubMed ID: 32322159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-efficiency particulate air filter test stand and aerosol generator for particle loading studies.
Arunkumar R; Hogancamp KU; Parsons MS; Rogers DM; Norton OP; Nagel BA; Alderman SL; Waggoner CA
Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Aug; 78(8):085105. PubMed ID: 17764353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Loading and filtration characteristics of filtering facepieces.
Chen CC; Lehtimäki M; Willeke K
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Feb; 54(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 8452097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wood dust particle and mass concentrations and filtration efficiency in sanding of wood materials.
Welling I; Lehtimäki M; Rautio S; Lähde T; Enbom S; Hynynen P; Hämeri K
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Feb; 6(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 19065389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 19261695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Worst-case" aerosol testing parameters: III. Initial penetration of charged and neutralized lead fume and silica dust aerosols through clean, unloaded respirator filters.
Moyer ES; Stevens GA
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 2543198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced nano-aerosol loading performance of multilayer PVDF nanofiber electret filters.
Sun Q; Leung WW
Sep Purif Technol; 2020 Jun; 240():116606. PubMed ID: 32288610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a tractor cab using real-time aerosol counting instrumentation.
Hall RM; Heitbrink WA; Reed LD
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Jan; 17(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11800406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: I. Sodium chloride and dioctyl phthalate aerosol filter efficiency as a function of particle size and flow rate.
Stevens GA; Moyer ES
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 2729101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
