These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22951560)
1. Opportunistic or population register based programmes for chlamydia screening? Bone A; Soldan K; Woodhall S; Clarke J; Gill ON BMJ; 2012 Sep; 345():e5887. PubMed ID: 22951560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. Jones R; Boag F BMJ; 2007 Apr; 334(7596):703-4. PubMed ID: 17413140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do? Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Chlamydia screening in young people fails to reduce prevalence. Mayor S BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b4736. PubMed ID: 19914952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Disentangling screening and diagnostic Chlamydia test positivity among females testing at title x-funded and adolescent health clinics, san francisco 2009. Stephens SC; Snell A; Liska S; Rauch L; Philip SS; Bernstein KT Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jul; 38(7):630-3. PubMed ID: 21301386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening and treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Kalwij S; Macintosh M; Baraitser P BMJ; 2010 Apr; 340():c1915. PubMed ID: 20410164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme. Gleave T Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment]. Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; Jager JC; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(47):2383-5. PubMed ID: 10590778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which group should be targeted and at what price?]. van Vloten WA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):652-3. PubMed ID: 10321294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Screening for chlamydia among sexually active young people]. Østergaard LJ; Gutschik E Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):162-4. PubMed ID: 11831079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Opportunistic chlamydia screening in a general practice consultation. Kalwij SA BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d5108. PubMed ID: 21844158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Snaring a silent threat. Chlamydia declining thanks to screening and prevention. Hobus P Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Oct; 10(10):63-6. PubMed ID: 12424886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Chlamydia screening in the Emergency Department reach a different section of the target population? Stanley L; Ellks R Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Nov; 88(7):551. PubMed ID: 22773330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Chlamydia test via Internet a good alternative to testing in clinics]. Stenqvist K; Lindqvist A; Almerson P; Jonsson L; Lander R Lakartidningen; 2010 Feb 10-16; 107(6):350-3. PubMed ID: 20297585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Chlamydia--the problem that just won't go away. Coughlan E; Bagshaw S N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1220):U1605. PubMed ID: 16132067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved]. Dekker JH Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City. Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The chlamydia problem in New Zealand. Perkins N N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1194):U887. PubMed ID: 15156205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Lack of evidence to support chlamydia infection screening]. Andersen B; Østergaard L; Olesen F Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Jul; 172(28):2059-61. PubMed ID: 20615375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chlamydia screening in a rural population: access, outcomes and health-care planning. Bendall RP; Keane FE; Barlow MJ; Paynter SJ Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Feb; 18(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 17331278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]