These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22954658)

  • 61. Sexual signals and mating patterns in Syngnathidae.
    Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
    J Fish Biol; 2011 Jun; 78(6):1647-61. PubMed ID: 21651521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5974):92-4. PubMed ID: 20203012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection.
    Hunt J; Breuker CJ; Sadowski JA; Moore AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 19120810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The allometric pattern of sexually size dimorphic feather ornaments and factors affecting allometry.
    Cuervo JJ; Møller AP
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jul; 22(7):1503-15. PubMed ID: 19467133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 19138156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Gene duplication might not resolve intralocus sexual conflict.
    Hosken DJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Nov; 26(11):556-7; author reply 558-9. PubMed ID: 21820199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection.
    Ingleby FC; Hunt J; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Oct; 23(10):2031-2045. PubMed ID: 20722891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Sex-related variation in migration phenology in relation to sexual dimorphism: a test of competing hypotheses for the evolution of protandry.
    Saino N; Rubolini D; Serra L; Caprioli M; Morganti M; Ambrosini R; Spina F
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Oct; 23(10):2054-2065. PubMed ID: 20722895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Allometry, sexual selection and evolutionary lines of least resistance shaped the evolution of exaggerated sexual traits within the genus Tyrannus.
    Fasanelli MN; Milla Carmona PS; Soto IM; Tuero DT
    J Evol Biol; 2022 May; 35(5):669-679. PubMed ID: 35290678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Ontogeny of a sexually selected structure in an extant archosaur
    Hone D; Mallon JC; Hennessey P; Witmer LM
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9134. PubMed ID: 32435543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Grey zones of sexual selection: why is finding a modern definition so hard?
    Alonzo SH; Servedio MR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Aug; 286(1909):20191325. PubMed ID: 31431160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Sexually antagonistic association between paternal phenotype and offspring viability reinforces total selection on a sexually selected trait.
    Martin AM; Festa-Bianchet M; Coltman DW; Pelletier F
    Biol Lett; 2014 Feb; 10(2):20140043. PubMed ID: 24573156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Fossil evidence sheds light on sexual selection during the early evolution of birds.
    Zhou Y; Pan Y; Wang M; Wang X; Zheng X; Zhou Z
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Jan; 121(3):e2309825120. PubMed ID: 38190528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Heightened condition-dependent growth of sexually selected weapons in the rhinoceros beetle, Trypoxylus dichotomus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).
    Johns A; Gotoh H; McCullough EL; Emlen DJ; Lavine LC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2014 Oct; 54(4):614-21. PubMed ID: 24827150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Biometric evidence that sexual selection has shaped the hominin face.
    Weston EM; Friday AE; Liò P
    PLoS One; 2007 Aug; 2(8):e710. PubMed ID: 17684556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Runaway evolution from male-male competition.
    Moore AJ; McGlothlin JW; Wolf JB
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Feb; 25(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 34784652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Sexual selection in complex environments.
    Miller CW; Svensson EI
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2014; 59():427-45. PubMed ID: 24160419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Mechanical limits to maximum weapon size in a giant rhinoceros beetle.
    McCullough EL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jul; 281(1786):. PubMed ID: 24827447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Sexual conflict as a partitioning of selection.
    Westneat DF; Sih A
    Biol Lett; 2009 Oct; 5(5):675-7. PubMed ID: 19443511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Why Sexually Selected Weapons Are Not Ornaments.
    McCullough EL; Miller CW; Emlen DJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2016 Oct; 31(10):742-751. PubMed ID: 27475833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.