399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22955004)
1. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1060-7. PubMed ID: 22955004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.
van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 17113139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate on the clinical performance of adhesive restorations: a 3-year follow-up.
Sartori N; Stolf SC; Silva SB; Lopes GC; Carrilho M
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1188-95. PubMed ID: 24076103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.
Türkün LS; Celik EU
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3-year clinical effectiveness of one-step adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.
Moretto SG; Russo EM; Carvalho RC; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Cardoso MV
J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 23747824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical bonding of a single-step self-etching adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Sörensson E
J Adhes Dent; 2007; 9 Suppl 2():241-3. PubMed ID: 18340979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized, controlled clinical trial of one-step self-etching adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
Zhou Z; Yu S; Jiang Y; Lin Y; Xiong Y; Ni L
Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 19824561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-year prospective clinical performance of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a nanofiller hybrid resin composite in Class V lesions.
Preussker S; Pöschmann M; Kensche A; Natusch I; Koch R; Klimm W; Hannig C
Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 25000664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized clinical evaluation of a one- and two-step self-etch adhesive over 24 months.
Loguercio AD; Mânica D; Ferneda F; Zander-Grande C; Amaral R; Stanislawczuk R; de Carvalho RM; Manso A; Reis A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 20533625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations.
Brackett WW; Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estudillo H
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16130861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
Arhun N; Celik C; Yamanel K
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A
J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class I and II composite restorations.
Chan DC; Browning WD; Frazier KB; Brackett MG
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 18505216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
