399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22955004)
21. Noncarious cervical lesions restored with three different tooth-colored materials: two-year results.
Stojanac IL; Premovic MT; Ramic BD; Drobac MR; Stojsin IM; Petrovic LM
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 22856681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth.
Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Silva MA; Pleffken PR; Rangel PM; Fernandes VV; Di Nicoló R; Torres CR
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23110580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomized controlled 5-year prospective study of two HEMA-free adhesives, a 1-step self etching and a 3-step etch-and-rinse, in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2013 Nov; 29(11):e271-80. PubMed ID: 24001950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of different light-curing units on the clinical performance of nanofilled composite resin restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: 3-year follow-up.
Yazici AR; Celik C; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 20157672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
Pollington S; van Noort R
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods.
Brackett WW; Covey DA; St Germain HA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 12025819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Four-year clinical evaluation of two self-etching dentin adhesives of different pH values used to restore non-retentive cervical lesions.
Söderholm KJ; Ottenga M; Nimmo S
Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23724546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M
Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions in Smokers.
de Carvalho LD; Gondo R; Lopes GC
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26525004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
Dalton Bittencourt D; Ezecelevski IG; Reis A; Van Dijken JW; Loguercio AD
Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Jun; 63(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 16191912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
