193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22956293)
1. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agency-communion and interest in prosocial behavior: social motives for assimilation and contrast explain sociocultural inconsistencies.
Gebauer JE; Sedikides C; Lüdtke O; Neberich W
J Pers; 2014 Oct; 82(5):452-66. PubMed ID: 24127868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of active assortment in spousal similarity.
Watson D; Beer A; McDade-Montez E
J Pers; 2014 Apr; 82(2):116-29. PubMed ID: 23551151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agency-communion and self-esteem relations are moderated by culture, religiosity, age, and sex: evidence for the "self-centrality breeds self-enhancement" principle.
Gebauer JE; Wagner J; Sedikides C; Neberich W
J Pers; 2013 Jun; 81(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 22812669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.
Mathes EW; Bielser A; Cassell T; Summers S; Witowski A
Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):502-11. PubMed ID: 17153821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction.
Botwin MD; Buss DM; Shackelford TK
J Pers; 1997 Mar; 65(1):107-36. PubMed ID: 9143146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship dealbreakers: traits people avoid in potential mates.
Jonason PK; Garcia JR; Webster GD; Li NP; Fisher HE
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1697-711. PubMed ID: 26445853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.
Schwarz S; Hassebrauck M
Hum Nat; 2012 Dec; 23(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 22941269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpersonal patterns in close relationships: the role of sociotropy-autonomy.
Sato T; Gonzalez MA
Br J Psychol; 2009 May; 100(Pt 2):327-45. PubMed ID: 18652736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowing your own mate value: sex-specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices.
Back MD; Penke L; Schmukle SC; Asendorpf JB
Psychol Sci; 2011 Aug; 22(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 21724949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are narcissists sexy? Zeroing in on the effect of narcissism on short-term mate appeal.
Dufner M; Rauthmann JF; Czarna AZ; Denissen JJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jul; 39(7):870-82. PubMed ID: 23554177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binds and bounds of communion: effects of interpersonal values on assumed similarity of self and others.
Locke KD; Craig T; Baik KD; Gohil K
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Nov; 103(5):879-97. PubMed ID: 22823290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships.
Valentine KA; Li NP; Meltzer AL; Tsai MH
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Feb; 46(2):298-311. PubMed ID: 31184259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Birds of a feather don't always fly farthest: similarity in Big Five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages.
Shiota MN; Levenson RW
Psychol Aging; 2007 Dec; 22(4):666-75. PubMed ID: 18179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality.
Gattis KS; Berns S; Simpson LE; Christensen A
J Fam Psychol; 2004 Dec; 18(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 15598162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.
Zentner M; Mitura K
Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1176-85. PubMed ID: 22933455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
