These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22956398)

  • 21. Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices.
    Riggle JD; Miller EE; McCrory B; Meitl A; Lim E; Hallbeck MS; LaGrange CA
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Apr; 24(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 25142199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Toward construct validity for a novel sensorized instrument-based minimally invasive surgery simulation system.
    Jayaraman S; Trejos AL; Naish MD; Lyle A; Patel RV; Schlachta CM
    Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1439-45. PubMed ID: 20976494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Twin Forceps: A New Instrument for SILS.
    Rizzuto A; Donnici M; Nudo P; Sinopoli B; Sacco R; Danieli G
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():361093. PubMed ID: 26346966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
    Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of laparoscopic graspers with enhanced haptic feedback on applied forces: a randomized comparison with conventional graspers.
    Alleblas CCJ; Vleugels MPH; Coppus SFPJ; Nieboer TE
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5411-5417. PubMed ID: 28593415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial.
    Bongers PJ; Diederick van Hove P; Stassen LP; Dankelman J; Schreuder HW
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25439179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Force sensing of multiple-DOF cable-driven instruments for minimally invasive robotic surgery.
    He C; Wang S; Sang H; Li J; Zhang L
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 24030887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of different sets of instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in a surgical simulator with novices.
    Wang D; Shi LQ; Wang JM; Jiang XH; Ji ZL
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 24224856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intracorporeal suturing: economy of instrument movements using a box trainer model.
    Hiemstra E; Chmarra MK; Dankelman J; Jansen FW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 21777839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving training of laparoscopic tissue manipulation skills using various visual force feedback types.
    Smit D; Spruit E; Dankelman J; Tuijthof G; Hamming J; Horeman T
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):299-308. PubMed ID: 27194263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attainment and retention of force moderation following laparoscopic resection training with visual force feedback.
    Hernandez R; Onar-Thomas A; Travascio F; Asfour S
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4805-4815. PubMed ID: 28411340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Objective differentiation of force-based laparoscopic skills using a novel haptic simulator.
    Singapogu RB; Smith DE; Long LO; Burg TC; Pagano CC; Burg KJ
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(6):766-73. PubMed ID: 23111044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally invasive surgery training using multiple port sites to improve performance.
    White AD; Giles O; Sutherland RJ; Ziff O; Mon-Williams M; Wilkie RM; Lodge JP
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Apr; 28(4):1188-93. PubMed ID: 24232133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks.
    Botden S; Strijkers R; Fransen S; Stassen L; Bouvy N
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Aug; 25(8):2703-10. PubMed ID: 21437738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Training to acquire psychomotor skills for endoscopic endonasal surgery using a personal webcam trainer.
    Hirayama R; Fujimoto Y; Umegaki M; Kagawa N; Kinoshita M; Hashimoto N; Yoshimine T
    J Neurosurg; 2013 May; 118(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23330994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An actuated force feedback-enabled laparoscopic instrument for robotic-assisted surgery.
    Moradi Dalvand M; Shirinzadeh B; Shamdani AH; Smith J; Zhong Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Mar; 10(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23640908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the Effect of Instrument Type on Transanal Endoscopic Surgery Learning Curves.
    Teitelbaum EN; Arafat FO; Boller AM
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Aug; 26(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 27380616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An ergonomic study of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic mesh insertion for ventral hernia repair.
    López-Cano M; Pereira JA; Mojal S; Lozoya R; Quiles MT; Arbós MA; Armengol-Carrasco M
    Eur Surg Res; 2012; 49(3-4):107-12. PubMed ID: 23095250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two cable configurations in 3D printed steerable instruments for minimally invasive surgery.
    Culmone C; van Starkenburg R; Smit G; Breedveld P
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275535. PubMed ID: 36194613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of force measurement system for clinical use in minimal access surgery.
    Hanna GB; Drew T; Arnold G; Fakhry M; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Feb; 22(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 17623237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.