These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22957028)

  • 1. Publication bias in laboratory animal research: a survey on magnitude, drivers, consequences and potential solutions.
    ter Riet G; Korevaar DA; Leenaars M; Sterk PJ; Van Noorden CJ; Bouter LM; Lutter R; Elferink RP; Hooft L
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43404. PubMed ID: 22957028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Web-based survey among animal researchers on publication practices and incentives for increasing publication rates.
    Deutsch S; Heider M; Glage S; Bleich A; Tolba R; Strech D; Wieschowski S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250362. PubMed ID: 33956811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes towards animal study registries and their characteristics: An online survey of three cohorts of animal researchers.
    Wieschowski S; Laser H; Sena ES; Bleich A; Tolba R; Strech D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226443. PubMed ID: 31905203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication bias in animal research presented at the 2008 Society of Critical Care Medicine Conference.
    Conradi U; Joffe AR
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jul; 10(1):262. PubMed ID: 28683761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Authorization of Animal Experiments Is Based on Confidence Rather than Evidence of Scientific Rigor.
    Vogt L; Reichlin TS; Nathues C; Würbel H
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Dec; 14(12):e2000598. PubMed ID: 27911892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice.
    Farrar BG; Ostojić L; Clayton NS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256607. PubMed ID: 34464406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perceived feasibility of methods to reduce publication bias.
    Carroll HA; Toumpakari Z; Johnson L; Betts JA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186472. PubMed ID: 29065125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.
    Gerrits RG; Jansen T; Mulyanto J; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027903. PubMed ID: 31097488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of basic medical researchers on the awareness of animal experimental designs and reporting standards in China.
    Ma B; Xu JK; Wu WJ; Liu HY; Kou CK; Liu N; Zhao L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174530. PubMed ID: 28380050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can animal data translate to innovations necessary for a new era of patient-centred and individualised healthcare? Bias in preclinical animal research.
    Green SB
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 16():53. PubMed ID: 26215508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments.
    Korevaar DA; Hooft L; ter Riet G
    Lab Anim; 2011 Oct; 45(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 21737463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing the publication of randomized controlled trials in child health research.
    Hartling L; Craig WR; Russell K; Stevens K; Klassen TP
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Oct; 158(10):983-7. PubMed ID: 15466687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results.
    Malički M; Marušić A;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1103-10. PubMed ID: 25034197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication rates in animal research. Extent and characteristics of published and non-published animal studies followed up at two German university medical centres.
    Wieschowski S; Biernot S; Deutsch S; Glage S; Bleich A; Tolba R; Strech D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0223758. PubMed ID: 31770377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting.
    Harris IA; Mourad MS; Kadir A; Solomon MJ; Young JM
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 16768761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects?
    Mann MD; Prentice ED
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Jan; 33(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 14752528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mitigating animal methods bias to reduce animal use and improve biomedical translation.
    Kavanagh O; Krebs CE
    Sci Prog; 2024; 107(2):368504241253693. PubMed ID: 38752259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A survey to assess animal methods bias in scientific publishing.
    Krebs CE; Lam A; McCarthy J; Constantino H; Sullivan K
    ALTEX; 2023; 40(4):665-676. PubMed ID: 37463512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.