210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22957600)
21. In-plane image quality and NPWE detectability index in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095013. PubMed ID: 32191923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Complex dark-field contrast and its retrieval in x-ray phase contrast imaging implemented with Talbot interferometry.
Yang Y; Tang X
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101914. PubMed ID: 25281966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of anatomical noise on optimal beam quality in mammography.
Cederström B; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121903. PubMed ID: 25471963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficiency of the Human Observer Compared to an Ideal Observer Based on a Generalized NEQ Which Incorporates Scatter and Geometric Unsharpness: Evaluation with a 2AFC Experiment.
Kyprianou IS; Ganguly A; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2005; 5749():251-262. PubMed ID: 21311735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Theoretical Framework for the Dual-Energy Cone-Beam CT Noise-Power Spectrum, NEQ, and Tasked-Based Detectability Index.
Gang GJ; Zbijewski W; Stayman JW; Carrino JA; Siewerdsen JH
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2012 Feb; 8313():. PubMed ID: 34188349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phase anomalies in Talbot light carpets of self-images.
Kim MS; Scharf T; Menzel C; Rockstuhl C; Herzig HP
Opt Express; 2013 Jan; 21(1):1287-300. PubMed ID: 23389022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance.
Gang GJ; Lee J; Stayman JW; Tward DJ; Zbijewski W; Prince JL; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1754-68. PubMed ID: 21626910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pulse pileup statistics for energy discriminating photon counting x-ray detectors.
Wang AS; Harrison D; Lobastov V; Tkaczyk JE
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4265-75. PubMed ID: 21859028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Moiré artifacts reduction in Talbot-Lau X-ray phase contrast imaging using a three-step iterative approach.
Tao S; Xu Y; Bai L; Tian Z; Hao X; Kuang C; Liu X
Opt Express; 2022 Sep; 30(20):35096-35111. PubMed ID: 36258469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. X-ray phase-contrast tomosynthesis for improved breast tissue discrimination.
Schleede S; Bech M; Grandl S; Sztrókay A; Herzen J; Mayr D; Stockmar M; Potdevin G; Zanette I; Rack A; Weitkamp T; Pfeiffer F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 24387825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT.
Tward DJ; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5510-29. PubMed ID: 19175110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Photon detection efficiency of laboratory-based x-ray phase contrast imaging techniques for mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Saghamanesh S; Aghamiri SM; Kamali-Asl A; Yashiro W
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7394-7406. PubMed ID: 28632500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Empirical beam hardening and ring artifact correction for x-ray grating interferometry (EBHC-GI).
Nelson BJ; Leng S; Shanblatt ER; McCollough CH; Koenig T
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1327-1340. PubMed ID: 33338261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task.
Richard S; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):127-39. PubMed ID: 17278498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images.
Richard S; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5043-53. PubMed ID: 19070238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CT.
Hernandez AM; Abbey CK; Ghazi P; Burkett G; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 32233091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Method of measuring NEQ as a quality control metric for digital mammography.
Bloomquist AK; Mainprize JG; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031905. PubMed ID: 24593723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cascaded systems analysis of charge sharing in cadmium telluride photon-counting x-ray detectors.
Tanguay J; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1926-1941. PubMed ID: 29526029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
