BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

709 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22957771)

  • 1. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual function through 4 contact lens-based pinhole systems for presbyopia.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Cerviño A; Charman WN; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 22424803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Llorente-Guillemot A; García-Lazaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Perez-Cambrodi RJ; Cerviño A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Jan; 95(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 22070196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoacuity with balanced presbyopic contact lenses.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jan; 94(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 21039847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial pupil versus contralateral balanced contact lens fit for presbyopia correction.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014 Apr; 77(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 25076468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision.
    Gupta N; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E98-105. PubMed ID: 19156009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual performance of a multifocal toric soft contact lens.
    Madrid-Costa D; Tomás E; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 23034336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.
    Fernandes PR; Neves HI; Lopes-Ferreira DP; Jorge JM; González-Meijome JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 23376896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Efficacy of Pinhole Soft Contact Lenses for the Correction of Presbyopia.
    Park SY; Choi YJ; Jung JW; Choi M; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2019; 34(2):106-114. PubMed ID: 30865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of the visual performance and aberrometric outcomes with a new hybrid and two silicone hydrogel multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Piñero DP; Carracedo G; Ruiz-Fortes P; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 26390908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodative functions with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Montés-Micó R; Madrid-Costa D; Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):998-1004. PubMed ID: 21552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective randomized clinical evaluation of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.
    Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Chu R; Stahl J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 158(3):436-46.e1. PubMed ID: 24932989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of vision with the Acri. Twin asymmetric diffractive bifocal intraocular lens system.
    Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L; Señaris A; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17276258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective study of the Acri.LISA bifocal intraocular lens.
    Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L; Señaris A; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1930-5. PubMed ID: 17964400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.