151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22958210)
1. A comparison of in-air and in-saline focimeter measurement of the back vertex power of spherical soft contact lenses.
Pearson RM; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 22958210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Refractive index and equilibrium water content of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
González-Méijome JM; Lira M; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA; Refojo MF
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 16390483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reproducibility of a new power mapping instrument based on the phase shifting schlieren method for the measurement of spherical and toric contact lenses.
Joannes L; Hough T; Hutsebaut X; Dubois X; Ligot R; Saoul B; Van Donink P; De Coninck K
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2010 Feb; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 20022552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aspects of wet cell measurement of back vertex power of contact lenses.
Pearson RM
Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 18430037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Verification of the vertex powers of varifocal rigid contact lenses.
Woods CA
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2003 Dec; 26(4):181-7. PubMed ID: 16303516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anomalies in the prescribing of soft contact lens power.
Young G; Moody K; Sulley A
Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jan; 35(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 19125042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicted tear layer oxygen tensions under two designs of silicone hydrogel toric lenses.
Forister JF; Chao J; Khy K; Forister E; Weissman BA
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Oct; 31(5):228-41; quiz 274-5. PubMed ID: 18672394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applanation tonometry in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.
Allen RJ; Dev Borman A; Saleh GM
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Dec; 30(5):267-9. PubMed ID: 17382579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sphero-cylindrical error for oblique gaze as a function of the position of the centre of rotation of the eye.
Perches S; Ares J; Collados V; Palos F
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jul; 33(4):456-66. PubMed ID: 23786385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A preliminary in vivo assessment of higher-order aberrations induced by a silicone hydrogel monofocal contact lens.
Awwad ST; Sanchez P; Sanchez A; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD
Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 18180674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tonopen XL assessment of intraocular pressure through silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Schornack M; Rice M; Hodge D
Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Sep; 38(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 22810946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Power profiles of single vision and multifocal soft contact lenses.
Wagner S; Conrad F; Bakaraju RC; Fedtke C; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 25139719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effect of Temperature on Soft Contact Lens Diameter.
Young G; Potts M; Sulley A
Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Sep; 42(5):298-302. PubMed ID: 26513721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the optical properties of soft contact lenses on and off the eye.
Kollbaum PS; Bradley A; Thibos LN
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Sep; 90(9):924-36. PubMed ID: 23969894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage contact lenses after LASEK.
Gil-Cazorla R; Teus MA; Hernández-Verdejo JL; De Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 85(9):884-8. PubMed ID: 18772724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refractive index of soft contact lens materials measured in packaging solution and standard phosphate buffered saline and the effect on back vertex power calculation.
Kim E; Ehrmann K
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Apr; 43(2):123-129. PubMed ID: 31870595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tear film surface quality with soft contact lenses using dynamic-area high-speed videokeratoscopy.
Alonso-Caneiro D; Iskander DR; Collins MJ
Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 19657279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current silicone hydrogel UVR blocking lenses and their associated protection factors.
DeLoss KS; Walsh JE; Bergmanson JP
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2010 Jun; 33(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 20042360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in water content of high plus hydrogel lenses worn on an extended wear basis in a geriatric aphakic population.
Patel S; Illahi W; Davies A
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2005 Sep; 28(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 16318843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of regimen methods for the removal and inactivation of bacteria, fungi and Acanthamoeba from two types of silicone hydrogel lenses.
Kilvington S; Lonnen J
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19201251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
