These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22958278)

  • 1. Computational prediction of protein-protein complexes.
    Mishra S
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Sep; 5():495. PubMed ID: 22958278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the assembly order of multimeric heteroprotein complexes.
    Peterson LX; Togawa Y; Esquivel-Rodriguez J; Terashi G; Christoffer C; Roy A; Shin WH; Kihara D
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005937. PubMed ID: 29329283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI.
    Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3085-95. PubMed ID: 20839234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition.
    Lensink MF; Velankar S; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):359-377. PubMed ID: 27865038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lessons from (co-)evolution in the docking of proteins and peptides for CAPRI Rounds 28-35.
    Yu J; Andreani J; Ochsenbein F; Guerois R
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):378-390. PubMed ID: 27701780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein-protein and peptide-protein docking and refinement using ATTRACT in CAPRI.
    Schindler CE; Chauvot de Beauchêne I; de Vries SJ; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):391-398. PubMed ID: 27785830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Great interactions: How binding incorrect partners can teach us about protein recognition and function.
    Vamparys L; Laurent B; Carbone A; Sacquin-Mora S
    Proteins; 2016 Oct; 84(10):1408-21. PubMed ID: 27287388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of ZDOCK and IRAD in CAPRI rounds 28-34.
    Vreven T; Pierce BG; Borrman TM; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 27718275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introducing a Clustering Step in a Consensus Approach for the Scoring of Protein-Protein Docking Models.
    Chermak E; De Donato R; Lensink MF; Petta A; Serra L; Scarano V; Cavallo L; Oliva R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166460. PubMed ID: 27846259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein-protein docking with binding site patch prediction and network-based terms enhanced combinatorial scoring.
    Gong X; Wang P; Yang F; Chang S; Liu B; He H; Cao L; Xu X; Li C; Chen W; Wang C
    Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3150-5. PubMed ID: 20806233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ECMIS: computational approach for the identification of hotspots at protein-protein interfaces.
    Shingate P; Manoharan M; Sukhwal A; Sowdhamini R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 15(1):303. PubMed ID: 25228146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009.
    Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3073-84. PubMed ID: 20806235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions.
    Xu X; Qiu L; Yan C; Ma Z; Grinter SZ; Zou X
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):424-434. PubMed ID: 27802576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial-Sequences and topology.
    Sowdhamini R; Mizuguchi K
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2017 Jun; 44():vii-viii. PubMed ID: 28587734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Progress and challenges in predicting protein interfaces.
    Esmaielbeiki R; Krawczyk K; Knapp B; Nebel JC; Deane CM
    Brief Bioinform; 2016 Jan; 17(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 25971595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicted binding site information improves model ranking in protein docking using experimental and computer-generated target structures.
    Maheshwari S; Brylinski M
    BMC Struct Biol; 2015 Nov; 15():23. PubMed ID: 26597230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards the prediction of protein interaction partners using physical docking.
    Wass MN; Fuentes G; Pons C; Pazos F; Valencia A
    Mol Syst Biol; 2011 Feb; 7():469. PubMed ID: 21326236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling and minimizing CAPRI round 30 symmetrical protein complexes from CASP-11 structural models.
    El Houasli M; Maigret B; Devignes MD; Ghoorah AW; Grudinin S; Ritchie DW
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):463-469. PubMed ID: 27701764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BindML/BindML+: Detecting Protein-Protein Interaction Interface Propensity from Amino Acid Substitution Patterns.
    Wei Q; La D; Kihara D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():279-289. PubMed ID: 27914057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.