156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22958648)
1. Estimation of genotyping error rate from repeat genotyping, unintentional recaptures and known parent-offspring comparisons in 16 microsatellite loci for brown rockfish (Sebastes auriculatus).
Hess MA; Rhydderch JG; LeClair LL; Buckley RM; Kawase M; Hauser L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Nov; 12(6):1114-23. PubMed ID: 22958648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion.
Hoffman JI; Amos W
Mol Ecol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 15660949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive genotyping and Mendelian analysis of microsatellites in African savannah elephants.
Okello JB; Wittemyer G; Rasmussen HB; Douglas-Hamilton I; Nyakaana S; Arctander P; Siegismund HR
J Hered; 2005; 96(6):679-87. PubMed ID: 16251516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Likelihood-based genetic mark-recapture estimates when genotype samples are incomplete and contain typing errors.
Macbeth GM; Broderick D; Ovenden JR; Buckworth RC
Theor Popul Biol; 2011 Nov; 80(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 21763337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parentage in natural populations: novel methods to detect parent-offspring pairs in large data sets.
Christie MR
Mol Ecol Resour; 2010 Jan; 10(1):115-28. PubMed ID: 21564996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
Wang J
Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification, inheritance, and variation of microsatellite markers in the black scallop Mimachlamys varia.
Arias A; Freire R; De La Roche JP; Román G; Méndez J; Insua A
Biochem Genet; 2011 Apr; 49(3-4):139-52. PubMed ID: 21110081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microsatellite DNA markers: evaluating their potential for estimating the proportion of hatchery-reared offspring in a stock enhancement programme.
Bravington MV; Ward RD
Mol Ecol; 2004 May; 13(5):1287-97. PubMed ID: 15078464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parentage testing in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) using semi-automated fluorescent multiplex PCRs with 10 microsatellite markers.
Agapito J; Rodríguez J; Herrera-Velit P; Timoteo O; Rojas P; Boettcher PJ; García F; Espinoza JR
Anim Genet; 2008 Apr; 39(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 18261186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dye shift: a neglected source of genotyping error in molecular ecology.
Sutton JT; Robertson BC; Jamieson IG
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 May; 11(3):514-20. PubMed ID: 21481209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
Morris RW; Kaplan NL
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-species amplification, non-invasive genotyping, and non-Mendelian inheritance of human STRPs in Savannah baboons.
Smith KL; Alberts SC; Bayes MK; Bruford MW; Altmann J; Ober C
Am J Primatol; 2000 Aug; 51(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 10941438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SNP development from RNA-seq data in a nonmodel fish: how many individuals are needed for accurate allele frequency prediction?
Schunter C; Garza JC; Macpherson E; Pascual M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Jan; 14(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 23992151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pooled genotyping of microsatellite markers in parent-offspring trios.
Kirov G; Williams N; Sham P; Craddock N; Owen MJ
Genome Res; 2000 Jan; 10(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 10645955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. megasat: automated inference of microsatellite genotypes from sequence data.
Zhan L; Paterson IG; Fraser BA; Watson B; Bradbury IR; Nadukkalam Ravindran P; Reznick D; Beiko RG; Bentzen P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 27333119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An optimized microsatellite genotyping strategy for assessing genetic identity and kinship in Azara's owl monkeys (Aotus azarai).
Babb PL; McIntosh AM; Fernandez-Duque E; Di Fiore A; Schurr TG
Folia Primatol (Basel); 2011; 82(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 21912137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing reliability of microsatellite genotypes from kit fox faecal samples using genetic and GIS analyses.
Smith DA; Ralls K; Hurt A; Adams B; Parker M; Maldonado JE
Mol Ecol; 2006 Feb; 15(2):387-406. PubMed ID: 16448408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping.
Ewen KR; Bahlo M; Treloar SA; Levinson DF; Mowry B; Barlow JW; Foote SJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 67(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 10924406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.
Grashei KE; Ødegård J; Meuwissen THE
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):26. PubMed ID: 29776335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal sample storage and extraction procotols for reliable multilocus genotyping of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni.
Van den Broeck F; Geldof S; Polman K; Volckaert FA; Huyse T
Infect Genet Evol; 2011 Aug; 11(6):1413-8. PubMed ID: 21605705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
