375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22959332)
1. Survey of quality, readability, and social reach of websites on osteosarcoma in adolescents.
Lam CG; Roter DL; Cohen KJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Jan; 90(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22959332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options.
Ellimoottil C; Polcari A; Kadlec A; Gupta G
J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2171-5. PubMed ID: 23083852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
McInnes N; Haglund BJ
Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear implantation: An assessment of quality and readability of web-based information aimed at patients.
Seymour N; Lakhani R; Hartley B; Cochrane L; Jephson C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):321-5. PubMed ID: 26154560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others.
Laplante-Lévesque A; Brännström KJ; Andersson G; Lunner T
Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):618-26. PubMed ID: 22731921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Information about oral cancer on the Internet: our patients cannot understand it.
Varela-Centelles P; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Seoane J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 25703184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tinnitus information online - does it ring true?
McKearney RM; MacKinnon RC; Smith M; Baker R
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Nov; 132(11):984-989. PubMed ID: 30353795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Informational Content, Readability and Comprehensibility of Online Health Information on Monogenic Diabetes.
Guan Y; Maloney KA; Roter DL; Pollin TI
J Genet Couns; 2018 Jun; 27(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 28951986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
Grewal P; Alagaratnam S
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer.
Narwani V; Nalamada K; Lee M; Kothari P; Lakhani R
Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 25491544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
Alamoudi U; Hong P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
