These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22959402)

  • 21. Opportunities for predicting and manipulating beef quality.
    Hocquette JF; Botreau R; Picard B; Jacquet A; Pethick DW; Scollan ND
    Meat Sci; 2012 Nov; 92(3):197-209. PubMed ID: 22554471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors associated with the purchase of designation of origin lamb meat.
    Sepúlveda WS; Maza MT; Mantecón AR
    Meat Sci; 2010 May; 85(1):167-73. PubMed ID: 20374881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of consumer insight in the new product development process in the meat sector.
    Grunert KG; Verbeke W; Kügler JO; Saeed F; Scholderer J
    Meat Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 21605939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Survival analysis applied to the sensory shelf-life dating of high hydrostatic pressure processed avocado and mango pulps.
    Jacobo-Velázquez DA; Ramos-Parra PA; Hernández-Brenes C
    J Food Sci; 2010 Aug; 75(6):S286-91. PubMed ID: 20722950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports.
    Schifferstein HN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jan; 121(1):41-64. PubMed ID: 16098945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of central nervous system tissue as bovine spongiform encephalopathy specified risk material in traditional Turkish meat products.
    Kale M; Hasircioglu S; Ozturk C; Kale AS; Dogruer Y
    J Sci Food Agric; 2012 Jun; 92(8):1653-6. PubMed ID: 22190149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Demographics and beef preferences affect consumer motivation for purchasing fresh beef steaks and roasts.
    Reicks AL; Brooks JC; Garmyn AJ; Thompson LD; Lyford CL; Miller MF
    Meat Sci; 2011 Apr; 87(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 21159449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigation for possible source(s) of contamination of ready-to-eat meat products with Listeria spp. and other pathogens in a meat processing plant in Trinidad.
    Gibbons IS; Adesiyun A; Seepersadsingh N; Rahaman S
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 23(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 16943025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consumer attitudes towards beef and beef technologies.
    Van Wezemael L; Verbeke W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2011; 76(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 21539204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Studying the effects of POs and MCs on the Salmonella ALOP with a quantitative risk assessment model for beef production.
    Tuominen P; Ranta J; Maijala R
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 118(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 17658191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consumer assessment of beef strip loin steaks of varying fat levels.
    O'Quinn TG; Brooks JC; Polkinghorne RJ; Garmyn AJ; Johnson BJ; Starkey JD; Rathmann RJ; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):626-34. PubMed ID: 21948609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. S-shape relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay premium prices for high quality cured pork products in Spain.
    Cotes-Torres A; Muñoz-Gallego PA; Cotes-Torres JM
    Meat Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):814-8. PubMed ID: 22118984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lysine, disodium guanylate and disodium inosinate as flavor enhancers in low-sodium fermented sausages.
    Campagnol PC; dos Santos BA; Terra NN; Pollonio MA
    Meat Sci; 2012 Jul; 91(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 22391056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acceptance of genetically modified foods: the relation between technology and evaluation.
    Tenbült P; De Vries NK; van Breukelen G; Dreezens E; Martijn C
    Appetite; 2008 Jul; 51(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 18336952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Processing companies' preferences for attributes of beef in Switzerland.
    Boesch I
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jan; 96(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 23896149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An investigative model evaluating how consumers process pictorial information on nonprescription medication labels.
    Sansgiry SS; Cady PS
    Health Mark Q; 1997; 14(4):71-90. PubMed ID: 10168485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consumers' ratings of the natural and unnatural qualities of foods.
    Evans G; de Challemaison B; Cox DN
    Appetite; 2010 Jun; 54(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 20197074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving functional value of meat products.
    Zhang W; Xiao S; Samaraweera H; Lee EJ; Ahn DU
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 20537806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.