98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22959791)
1. Total shoulder arthroplasty: Some considerations related to glenoid surface contact.
Ballmer FT; Lippitt SB; Romeo AA; Matsen FA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 1994 Sep; 3(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 22959791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement.
Williams GR; Wong KL; Pepe MD; Tan V; Silverberg D; Ramsey ML; Karduna A; Iannotti JP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2001; 10(5):399-409. PubMed ID: 11641695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo articular cartilage contact at the glenohumeral joint: preliminary report.
Boyer PJ; Massimini DF; Gill TJ; Papannagari R; Stewart SL; Warner JP; Li G
J Orthop Sci; 2008 Jul; 13(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 18696196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glenohumeral contact kinematics in patients after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Massimini DF; Li G; Warner JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 92(4):916-26. PubMed ID: 20360516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Normalization of glenohumeral articular contact pressures after Latarjet or iliac crest bone-grafting.
Ghodadra N; Gupta A; Romeo AA; Bach BR; Verma N; Shewman E; Goldstein J; Provencher MT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jun; 92(6):1478-89. PubMed ID: 20516324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Prosthetic Mismatch and Subscapularis Tear on Glenohumeral Contact Patterns in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Numerical Musculoskeletal Analysis.
Sins L; Tétreault P; Nuño N; Hagemeister N
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27617433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders.
Iannotti JP; Gabriel JP; Schneck SL; Evans BG; Misra S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Apr; 74(4):491-500. PubMed ID: 1583043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic humeral head resurfacing and hemiarthroplasty in functional glenohumeral positions.
Hammond G; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Jun BJ; Lee TQ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jan; 94(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 22218384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of glenohumeral contact pressures and contact areas after glenoid reconstruction with latarjet or distal tibial osteochondral allografts.
Bhatia S; Van Thiel GS; Gupta D; Ghodadra N; Cole BJ; Bach BR; Shewman E; Wang VM; Romeo AA; Verma NN; Provencher MT
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Aug; 41(8):1900-8. PubMed ID: 23775244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. A study in cadavera.
Harryman DT; Sidles JA; Harris SL; Lippitt SB; Matsen FA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Apr; 77(4):555-63. PubMed ID: 7713972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A numerical study of the contact geometry and pressure distribution along the glenoid track.
Junior ANT; Pécora JOR; Neto AAF; Roesler CRM; Fancello EA
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Dec; 110():103898. PubMed ID: 36564134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: Implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique.
Pearl ML
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2005; 14(1 Suppl S):99S-104S. PubMed ID: 15726095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Berhouet J; Garaud P; Favard L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):887-94. PubMed ID: 24211248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mal-aligning humeral offset may not effect shoulder hemiarthroplasty: a biomechanical study.
McMahon PJ; Dee DT; Yang BY; Lee TQ
Med Sci Monit; 2003 Aug; 9(8):CR346-52. PubMed ID: 12942030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement.
Pearl ML; Kurutz S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 May; 81(5):660-71. PubMed ID: 10360694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing the glenoid contribution to the stability of a humeral hemiarthroplasty without a prosthetic glenoid.
Weldon EJ; Boorman RS; Smith KL; Matsen FA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Sep; 86(9):2022-9. PubMed ID: 15342766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of glenoid component inclination on its fixation and humeral head subluxation in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Oosterom R; Rozing PM; Bersee HE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Dec; 19(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 15531049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-assessed outcome at two to four years after shoulder hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming.
Lynch JR; Franta AK; Montgomery WH; Lenters TR; Mounce D; Matsen FA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jun; 89(6):1284-92. PubMed ID: 17545432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors.
Gutiérrez S; Comiskey CA; Luo ZP; Pupello DR; Frankle MA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 90(12):2606-15. PubMed ID: 19047705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterior-inferior capsular shift of the shoulder: a biomechanical comparison of glenoid-based versus humeral-based shift strategies.
Deutsch A; Barber JE; Davy DT; Victoroff BN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2001; 10(4):340-52. PubMed ID: 11517364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
