These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Planning movements well in advance. Hesse C; de Grave DD; Franz VH; Brenner E; Smeets JB Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):985-95. PubMed ID: 18608330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-task interference is greater in delayed grasping than in visually guided grasping. Singhal A; Culham JC; Chinellato E; Goodale MA J Vis; 2007 May; 7(5):5.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach. Cohen NR; Cross ES; Tunik E; Grafton ST; Culham JC Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19168086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The limits of attention for visual perception and action in aging. Lee TY; Hsieh S Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009 May; 16(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 19301162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequential actions: effects of upcoming perceptual and motor tasks on current actions. LeBlanc KA; Westwood DA Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):955-62. PubMed ID: 26680770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visuomotor priming of a manual reaching movement during a perceptual decision task. Olivier G Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1124(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17069774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of near threshold visual distractors on perceptual detection and reaching movements. Deplancke A; Madelain L; Chauvin A; Cardoso-Leite P; Gorea A; Coello Y J Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 104(4):2249-56. PubMed ID: 20702742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual cognitive task affects reaching and grasping behavior in subjects with macular disorders. Pardhan S; Zuidhoek S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 May; 54(5):3281-8. PubMed ID: 23548620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Grasping for parsimony: do some motor actions escape dorsal processing? Janczyk M; Franz VH; Kunde W Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3405-15. PubMed ID: 20599441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional dissociation between action and perception of object shape in developmental visual object agnosia. Freud E; Ganel T; Avidan G; Gilaie-Dotan S Cortex; 2016 Mar; 76():17-27. PubMed ID: 26827163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions. Katsumata H Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional. Jonikaitis D; Schubert T; Deubel H J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):23. PubMed ID: 21172898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An object-centred reference frame for control of grasping: effects of grasping a distractor object on visuomotor control. Patchay S; Haggard P; Castiello U Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(4):532-42. PubMed ID: 16307260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation. Dewar MT; Carey DP Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements. Juravle G; Deubel H; Spence C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Oct; 138(2):302-10. PubMed ID: 21872190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure. Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Viewing objects and planning actions: on the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects. Makris S; Hadar AA; Yarrow K Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 21903319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]