These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22960537)

  • 1. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro.
    Roggendorf MJ; Krämer N; Dippold C; Vosen VE; Naumann M; Jablonski-Momeni A; Frankenberger R
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1068-73. PubMed ID: 22960537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R; Hehn J; Hajtó J; Krämer N; Naumann M; Koch A; Roggendorf MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays.
    Müller V; Friedl KH; Friedl K; Hahnel S; Handel G; Lang R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):607-612. PubMed ID: 27507168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of surface treatment on fatigue behaviour between Tetric Ceram inlays and Variolink luting composite.
    Frankenberger R; Strobel WO; Baresel J; Trapper T; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Dec; 5(4):260-5. PubMed ID: 11800440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
    Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite.
    Roggendorf MJ; Krämer N; Appelt A; Naumann M; Frankenberger R
    J Dent; 2011 Oct; 39(10):643-7. PubMed ID: 21801799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials.
    Schenke F; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 18833858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: an in vivo investigation.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20830881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.
    Aschenbrenner CM; Lang R; Handel G; Behr M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.