These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Defensive medicine and obstetrics. Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Lloyd M; Fordyce M; Rosenblatt RA JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1606-10. PubMed ID: 7474245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section. Stafford RS JAMA; 1991 Jan; 265(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1984126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates. Dubay L; Kaestner R; Waidmann T J Health Econ; 1999 Aug; 18(4):491-522. PubMed ID: 10539619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Professional liability issues and practice patterns of obstetric providers in Washington State. Benedetti TJ; Baldwin LM; Skillman SM; Andrilla CH; Bowditch E; Carr KC; Myers SJ Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 107(6):1238-46. PubMed ID: 16738147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery. Baicker K; Buckles KS; Chandra A Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(5):w355-67. PubMed ID: 16895942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetrician who blamed delay in a Caesarean section on a "stupid midwife" is struck off. Dyer C BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6066. PubMed ID: 25294060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A discussion of medical malpractice and cesarean section. Berkman H Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Apr; (170):9-30. PubMed ID: 10125422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of the ACOG guideline on vaginal births after cesarean. Santerre RE Med Care Res Rev; 1996 Sep; 53(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 10159931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Green Bay cesarean section study. III. Falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program. Sandmire HF; DeMott RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1790-9; discussion 1799-802. PubMed ID: 8203440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of malpractice liability claims on obstetrical practice patterns. Gimm GW Health Serv Res; 2010 Feb; 45(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 19929964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Who is responsible for the rising caesarean section rate? Usha Kiran TS; Jayawickrama NS J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):363-5. PubMed ID: 12521454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing cesarean delivery rates in managed care organizations. Mawson AR Am J Manag Care; 2002 Aug; 8(8):730-40. PubMed ID: 12212760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Keeler EB; Brodie M Milbank Q; 1993; 71(3):365-404. PubMed ID: 8413067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A successful program to reduce cesarean section rates: friendly persuasion. Myers SA; Gleicher N QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 May; 17(5):162-6. PubMed ID: 2052351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]