These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2296123)

  • 21. Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.
    Gleicher N
    JAMA; 1984 Dec; 252(23):3273-6. PubMed ID: 6512931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth. The Cesarean Birth Task Force.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Apr; 57(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 7243111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Malpractice and obstetric practice: the correlation of malpractice premiums to rates of vaginal and cesarean delivery.
    Johnson CT; Choubey V; Satin AJ; Werner EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):545-546. PubMed ID: 26767796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of legislatively imposed practice guidelines on cesarean section rates: the Florida experience.
    Studnicki J; Remmel R; Campbell R; Werner DC
    Am J Med Qual; 1997; 12(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 9116534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating the C-section rate of different physician practices: using machine learning to model standard practice.
    Caruana R; Niculescu RS; Rao RB; Simms C
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():135-9. PubMed ID: 14728149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.
    Localio AR; Lawthers AG; Bengtson JM; Hebert LE; Weaver SL; Brennan TA; Landis JR
    JAMA; 1993 Jan; 269(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 8418343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vaginal birth after cesarean: issues and implications.
    Resick LK; Erlen JA
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 1990; 2(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 2400620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois.
    Rock SM
    Public Health Rep; 1988; 103(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 3140270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Dec; 319(23):1511-6. PubMed ID: 3185675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Midwives and cesarean sections.
    Weil L
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Jun; 32(6):1171. PubMed ID: 23733992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating the appropriateness of care: a study of cesarean section rates.
    Kazandjian VA; Summer SJ
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1989 Jul; 15(7):206-14. PubMed ID: 2771383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cesarean sections: the authors reply.
    Kozhimannil KB; Virnig BA; Law MR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Jun; 32(6):1171. PubMed ID: 23733993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does Experience Rating Improve Obstetric Practices? Evidence from Italy.
    Amaral-Garcia S; Bertoli P; Grembi V
    Health Econ; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1050-64. PubMed ID: 26095679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic.
    Visser GHA; Ayres-de-Campos D; Barnea ER; de Bernis L; Di Renzo GC; Vidarte MFE; Lloyd I; Nassar AH; Nicholson W; Shah PK; Stones W; Sun L; Theron GB; Walani S
    Lancet; 2018 Oct; 392(10155):1286-1287. PubMed ID: 30322563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision.
    Burns LR; Geller SE; Wholey DR
    Med Care; 1995 Apr; 33(4):365-82. PubMed ID: 7731278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis.
    Ryan K; Schnatz P; Greene J; Curry S
    Conn Med; 2005 Mar; 69(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 15861999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Strategies directed to professionals for reducing unnecessary cesarean sections in Brazil].
    Haddad SM; Cecatti JG
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 May; 33(5):252-62. PubMed ID: 21860933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section.
    Schifrin BS; Cohen WR
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 23206669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Repeat cesarean section and primary elective cesarean section: recently trained obstetrician-gynecologist practice patterns and opinions.
    Kenton K; Brincat C; Mutone M; Brubaker L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1872-5; discussion 1875-6. PubMed ID: 15970836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Appropriate use of caesarean section globally requires a different approach.
    Wiklund I; Malata AM; Cheung NF; Cadée F
    Lancet; 2018 Oct; 392(10155):1288-1289. PubMed ID: 30322564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.