These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22961312)

  • 1. Application of real-time loudness models can improve speech recognition for cochlear implant users.
    Varsavsky A; McDermott HJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Jan; 21(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 22961312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness normalization for cochlear implant using pulse-rate modulation to convey Mandarin tonal information: a model-based study.
    Chen F; Zhang YT
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1236-9. PubMed ID: 17946451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Deep Denoising Autoencoder Approach to Improving the Intelligibility of Vocoded Speech in Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Lai YH; Chen F; Wang SS; Lu X; Tsao Y; Lee CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jul; 64(7):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 28113304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C; Fu QJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):114-24. PubMed ID: 23000118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study on the effect of spectral details encoding in speech processing on Mandarin recognition for cochlear implants users with speech maskers].
    Guan T; Xu T; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 18610637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.
    McDermott H; Varsavsky A
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):065007. PubMed ID: 19850972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of loudness models to sound processing for cochlear implants.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM; Richardson LM; Henshall KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2190-7. PubMed ID: 14587616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a real time sparse non-negative matrix factorization module for cochlear implants by using xPC target.
    Hu H; Krasoulis A; Lutman M; Bleeck S
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Oct; 13(10):13861-78. PubMed ID: 24129021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.
    Spirrov D; Van Eeckhoutte M; Van Deun L; Francart T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195412. PubMed ID: 29617421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.