238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22961593)
1. Validation of a task-specific scoring system for a microvascular surgery simulation model.
Nimmons GL; Chang KE; Funk GF; Shonka DC; Pagedar NA
Laryngoscope; 2012 Oct; 122(10):2164-8. PubMed ID: 22961593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simulating various levels of clinical challenge in the assessment of clinical procedure competence.
Kyaw Tun J; Granados A; Mavroveli S; Nuttall S; Kadiyala AN; Brown R; Bello F; Kneebone RL
Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Jul; 60(1):112-20.e5. PubMed ID: 22542307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice.
Price J; Naik V; Boodhwani M; Brandys T; Hendry P; Lam BK
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 142(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 21742349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skills acquisition and assessment after a microsurgical skills course for ophthalmology residents.
Ezra DG; Aggarwal R; Michaelides M; Okhravi N; Verma S; Benjamin L; Bloom P; Darzi A; Sullivan P
Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 19091411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel supermicrosurgery training model: the chicken thigh.
Chen WF; Eid A; Yamamoto T; Keith J; Nimmons GL; Lawrence WT
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Jul; 67(7):973-8. PubMed ID: 24742690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of an operating room immersive microlaryngoscopy simulator.
Fleming J; Kapoor K; Sevdalis N; Harries M
Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 22447525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microvascular anastomosis simulation using a chicken thigh model: Interval versus massed training.
Schoeff S; Hernandez B; Robinson DJ; Jameson MJ; Shonka DC
Laryngoscope; 2017 Nov; 127(11):2490-2494. PubMed ID: 28407264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective structured assessment of technical skills for repair of fourth-degree perineal lacerations.
Siddiqui NY; Stepp KJ; Lasch SJ; Mangel JM; Wu JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):676.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19084100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new curriculum for hysteroscopy training as demonstrated by an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS).
VanBlaricom AL; Goff BA; Chinn M; Icasiano MM; Nielsen P; Mandel L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 193(5):1856-65. PubMed ID: 16260249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the efficacy of microsurgical practice through time factor added protocol: microsurgical training using nonvital material.
Hong JW; Kim YS; Lee WJ; Hong HJ; Roh TS; Song SY
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):876-81. PubMed ID: 20485073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validated assessment tool paves the way for standardized evaluation of trainees on anastomotic models.
Duran CA; Shames M; Bismuth J; Lee JT;
Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 28(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 24189012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the correlation between the HUESAD and OSATS scores: concurrent validity study.
Egi H; Tokunaga M; Hattori M; Ohdan H
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2013 Jun; 22(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 23134442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using objective structured assessment of technical skills to evaluate a basic skills simulation curriculum for first-year surgical residents.
Chipman JG; Schmitz CC
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Sep; 209(3):364-370.e2. PubMed ID: 19717041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Evaluation of a Simulation Model for Microvascular Anastomosis Training.
Willis RE; Wiersch J; Adams AJ; Al Fayyadh MJ; Weber RA; Wang HT
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Sep; 33(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 28472839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of resident surgical skills: is testing feasible?
Goff B; Mandel L; Lentz G; Vanblaricom A; Oelschlager AM; Lee D; Galakatos A; Davies M; Nielsen P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1331-8; discussion 1338-40. PubMed ID: 15846232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A New Synthetic Model for Microvascular Anastomosis Training? A Randomized Comparative Study Between Silicone and Polyvinyl Alcohol Gelatin Tubes.
Atlan M; Lellouch AG; Legagneux J; Chaouat M; Masquelet AC; Letourneur D
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(1):182-187. PubMed ID: 28673805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of objective, structured assessment of technical skills with a virtual reality hysteroscopy trainer and standard latex hysteroscopy model.
Goff BA; VanBlaricom A; Mandel L; Chinn M; Nielsen P
J Reprod Med; 2007 May; 52(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 17583240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing microsurgical skill acquisition during a dedicated training course.
Nugent E; Joyce C; Perez-Abadia G; Frank J; Sauerbier M; Neary P; Gallagher AG; Traynor O; Carroll S
Microsurgery; 2012 Nov; 32(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 23086761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validated assessment tools for pediatric airway endoscopy simulation.
Jabbour N; Reihsen T; Payne NR; Finkelstein M; Sweet RM; Sidman JD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Dec; 147(6):1131-5. PubMed ID: 22951432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transfer of training in robotic-assisted microvascular surgery.
Karamanoukian RL; Bui T; McConnell MP; Evans GR; Karamanoukian HL
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):662-5. PubMed ID: 17122554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
