These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22962499)

  • 1. Signal identification for rare and weak features: higher criticism or false discovery rates?
    Klaus B; Strimmer K
    Biostatistics; 2013 Jan; 14(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 22962499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature selection by higher criticism thresholding achieves the optimal phase diagram.
    Donoho D; Jin J
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2009 Nov; 367(1906):4449-70. PubMed ID: 19805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False discovery rate estimation for large-scale homogeneous discrete p-values.
    Liang K
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):639-48. PubMed ID: 26492596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate.
    Scheid S; Spang R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wavelet thresholding with bayesian false discovery rate control.
    Tadesse MG; Ibrahim JG; Vannucci M; Gentleman R
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15737075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
    Qian HR; Huang S
    Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model selection based on FDR-thresholding optimizing the area under the ROC-curve.
    Graf AC; Bauer P
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article31. PubMed ID: 19572830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data.
    Grant GR; Liu J; Stoeckert CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2684-90. PubMed ID: 15797908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
    Jung SH
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
    Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate.
    Langers DR; Jansen JF; Backes WH
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17825583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Separate class true discovery rate degree of association sets for biomarker identification.
    Crager MR; Ahmed M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(5):1022-34. PubMed ID: 24915145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD
    Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.