These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22962499)

  • 21. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two-stage designs for experiments with a large number of hypotheses.
    Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(19):3771-7. PubMed ID: 16091414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pharmacovigilance data mining with methods based on false discovery rates: a comparative simulation study.
    Ahmed I; Thiessard F; Miremont-Salamé G; Bégaud B; Tubert-Bitter P
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Oct; 88(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 20811349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A note on the false discovery rate and inconsistent comparisons between experiments.
    Higdon R; van Belle G; Kolker E
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(10):1225-8. PubMed ID: 18424815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An enhanced quantile approach for assessing differential gene expressions.
    Wang H; He X
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 18325069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative trait Loci analysis using the false discovery rate.
    Benjamini Y; Yekutieli D
    Genetics; 2005 Oct; 171(2):783-90. PubMed ID: 15956674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
    Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identification of partially linear structure in additive models with an application to gene expression prediction from sequences.
    Lian H; Chen X; Yang JY
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):437-45. PubMed ID: 21950383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family-wise error rate.
    Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4145-60. PubMed ID: 18444249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Meta-analysis based on control of false discovery rate: combining yeast ChIP-chip datasets.
    Pyne S; Futcher B; Skiena S
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2516-22. PubMed ID: 16908499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis.
    Malo N; Hanley JA; Cerquozzi S; Pelletier J; Nadon R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 24(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 16465162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outlier sums for differential gene expression analysis.
    Tibshirani R; Hastie T
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jan; 8(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16702229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Higher criticism thresholding: Optimal feature selection when useful features are rare and weak.
    Donoho D; Jin J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Sep; 105(39):14790-5. PubMed ID: 18815365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
    Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bayesian pharmacovigilance signal detection methods revisited in a multiple comparison setting.
    Ahmed I; Haramburu F; Fourrier-Réglat A; Thiessard F; Kreft-Jais C; Miremont-Salamé G; Bégaud B; Tubert-Bitter P
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(13):1774-92. PubMed ID: 19360795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sharp simultaneous confidence intervals for the means of selected populations with application to microarray data analysis.
    Qiu J; Hwang JT
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 17403105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.
    Wu B; Guan Z; Zhao H
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 16984315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian models based on test statistics for multiple hypothesis testing problems.
    Ji Y; Lu Y; Mills GB
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(7):943-9. PubMed ID: 18245123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.