These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2296291)
1. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Ryan MJ; Fox JH; Wilczynski W; Rand AS Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6253):66-7. PubMed ID: 2296291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Animal communication: complex call production in the túngara frog. Gridi-Papp M; Rand AS; Ryan MJ Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):38. PubMed ID: 16672962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Wilczynski W; Rand AS; Ryan MJ Brain Behav Evol; 2001; 58(3):137-51. PubMed ID: 11910171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of sexual behavior in túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus). Baugh AT; Ryan MJ J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 20175598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems. Gerhardt HC Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vocal communication in frogs. Kelley DB Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 15582379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geographic variation of genetic and behavioral traits in northern and southern tüngara frogs. Pröhl H; Koshy RA; Mueller U; Rand AS; Ryan MJ Evolution; 2006 Aug; 60(8):1669-79. PubMed ID: 17017067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. THE SENSORY BASIS OF SEXUAL SELECTION FOR COMPLEX CALLS IN THE TÚNGARA FROG, PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS (SEXUAL SELECTION FOR SENSORY EXPLOITATION). Ryan MJ; Rand AS Evolution; 1990 Mar; 44(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 28564368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs. Kime NM; Whitney TK; Ryan MJ; Rand AS; Marler CA Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2010 Jan; 165(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 19576218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complexity increases working memory for mating signals. Akre KL; Ryan MJ Curr Biol; 2010 Mar; 20(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 20206525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls? Jones PL; Farris HE; Ryan MJ; Page RA J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Apr; 199(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 23322446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The vocal sac increases call rate in the Tungara frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Pauly GB; Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ Physiol Biochem Zool; 2006; 79(4):708-19. PubMed ID: 16826497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs. Kime NM; Whitney TK; Davis ES; Marler CA Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 69(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 17299257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles. Fedina TY; Lewis SM Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Squirrel monkey chuck call: vocal response to playback chucks based on acoustic structure and affiliative relationship with the caller. Soltis J; Bernhards D; Donkin H; Newman JD Am J Primatol; 2002 Jul; 57(3):119-30. PubMed ID: 12111678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Species differences in auditory processing dynamics in songbird auditory telencephalon. Terleph TA; Mello CV; Vicario DS Dev Neurobiol; 2007 Sep; 67(11):1498-510. PubMed ID: 17525994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals. Ryan MJ; Rand W; Hurd PL; Phelps SM; Rand AS Am Nat; 2003 Mar; 161(3):380-94. PubMed ID: 12699219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. Fuller RC; Houle D; Travis J Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 16224700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]