These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22963835)

  • 21. Individuation of parts of a single object and multiple distinct objects relies on a common neural mechanism in inferior intraparietal sulcus.
    Wurm MF; Porter KB; Caramazza A
    Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():1-15. PubMed ID: 31539828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains.
    Fink GR; Dolan RJ; Halligan PW; Marshall JC; Frith CD
    Brain; 1997 Nov; 120 ( Pt 11)():2013-28. PubMed ID: 9397018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clutter modulates the representation of target objects in the human occipitotemporal cortex.
    Erez Y; Yovel G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):490-500. PubMed ID: 24144245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retinotopy and attention in human occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex.
    Saygin AP; Sereno MI
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Sep; 18(9):2158-68. PubMed ID: 18234687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Object Selection by Automatic Spreading of Top-Down Attentional Signals in V1.
    Ekman M; Roelfsema PR; de Lange FP
    J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(48):9250-9259. PubMed ID: 33087475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Occipital, parietal, and frontal cortices selectively maintain task-relevant features of multi-feature objects in visual working memory.
    Yu Q; Shim WM
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():97-107. PubMed ID: 28559190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Frontal and parietal cortical interactions with distributed visual representations during selective attention and action selection.
    Nelissen N; Stokes M; Nobre AC; Rushworth MF
    J Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 33(42):16443-58. PubMed ID: 24133250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Occipital-parietal interactions during shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention: trial-dependent changes of effective connectivity.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15707797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attention mechanisms in visual search -- an fMRI study.
    Leonards U; Sunaert S; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000; 12 Suppl 2():61-75. PubMed ID: 11506648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames.
    Wilson KD; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):668-83. PubMed ID: 15808968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual spatial attention enhances the amplitude of positive and negative fMRI responses to visual stimulation in an eccentricity-dependent manner.
    Bressler DW; Fortenbaugh FC; Robertson LC; Silver MA
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():104-12. PubMed ID: 23562388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural evidence linking visual object enumeration and attention.
    Sathian K; Simon TJ; Peterson S; Patel GA; Hoffman JM; Grafton ST
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 Jan; 11(1):36-51. PubMed ID: 9950713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.
    Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial attention facilitates selection of illusory objects: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Martínez A; Teder-Salejarvi W; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1139():143-52. PubMed ID: 17288996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural correlates of conscious perception in the attentional blink.
    Kranczioch C; Debener S; Schwarzbach J; Goebel R; Engel AK
    Neuroimage; 2005 Feb; 24(3):704-14. PubMed ID: 15652305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tracking the completion of parts into whole objects: Retinotopic activation in response to illusory figures in the lateral occipital complex.
    Chen S; Weidner R; Zeng H; Fink GR; Müller HJ; Conci M
    Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 207():116426. PubMed ID: 31794856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
    Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural representation of targets and distractors during object individuation and identification.
    Jeong SK; Xu Y
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 25(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 23198893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex.
    Ester EF; Sutterer DW; Serences JT; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8188-99. PubMed ID: 27488638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
    Long NM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 29437930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.