These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22963922)
1. What counts and how to count it: physicians' constructions of evidence in a disinvestment context. Hodgetts K; Elshaug AG; Hiller JE Soc Sci Med; 2012 Dec; 75(12):2191-9. PubMed ID: 22963922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disinvestment policy and the public funding of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups. Hodgetts K; Hiller JE; Street JM; Carter D; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Watt AM; Moss JR; Elshaug AG; BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 May; 14():204. PubMed ID: 24885716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ASTUTE Health study protocol: deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment. Watt AM; Hiller JE; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Moss JR; Buchan H; Wale J; Riitano DE; Hodgetts K; Street JM; Elshaug AG; Implement Sci; 2012 Oct; 7():101. PubMed ID: 23088222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Engaging clinicians in evidence-based disinvestment: role and perceptions of evidence. Watt AM; Willis CD; Hodgetts K; Elshaug AG; Hiller JE Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jul; 28(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 22980696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization]. Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring policy-makers' perspectives on disinvestment from ineffective healthcare practices. Elshaug AG; Hiller JE; Moss JR Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18218163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative analysis of assisted reproductive technology cycles in Australia and New Zealand 2004-2007. Farquhar CM; Wang YA; Sullivan EA Hum Reprod; 2010 Sep; 25(9):2281-9. PubMed ID: 20650968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges. Ziebe S; Devroey P; Hum Reprod Update; 2008; 14(6):583-92. PubMed ID: 18786951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Who should pay for assisted reproductive techniques? Answers from patients, professionals and the general public in Germany. Rauprich O; Berns E; Vollmann J Hum Reprod; 2010 May; 25(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 20228390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Citizens' Perspectives on Disinvestment from Publicly Funded Pathology Tests: A Deliberative Forum. Street JM; Callaghan P; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Hiller JE Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1050-6. PubMed ID: 26686790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability. Viitanen J; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T; Vänskä J; Reponen J; Winblad I Int J Med Inform; 2011 Oct; 80(10):708-25. PubMed ID: 21784701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family. Schor EL; Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inequitable access to assisted reproductive technology for the low-income Brazilian population: a qualitative study. Makuch MY; Simônia de Padua K; Petta CA; Duarte Osis MJ; Bahamondes L Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2054-60. PubMed ID: 21613314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness to inform disinvestment policy. Watt AM; Elshaug AG; Willis CD; Hiller JE; Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):200-13. PubMed ID: 21868120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies? Flitcroft K; Gillespie J; Salkeld G; Carter S; Trevena L Soc Sci Med; 2011 Apr; 72(7):1039-46. PubMed ID: 21419539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]