437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22964089)
1. Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: feasibility and reproducibility.
Moineau G; Levigne C; Boileau P; Young A; Walch G;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 98(6 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 22964089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hoenecke HR; Hermida JC; Flores-Hernandez C; D'Lima DD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Mar; 19(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 19959378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 2-dimensional glenoid vault method for measuring glenoid version on computed tomography.
Poon PC; Ting FS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Mar; 21(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 21782473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Description and reproducibility assessment of a new computerised tomography scan index to measure the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior glenoid surface.
Moraiti C; Klouche S; Werthel JD; Bauer T; Hardy P
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):1017-1022. PubMed ID: 27699459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurements of three-dimensional glenoid erosion when planning the prosthetic replacement of osteoarthritic shoulders.
Terrier A; Ston J; Larrea X; Farron A
Bone Joint J; 2014 Apr; 96-B(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 24692620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability analysis of glenoid component inclination measurements on postoperative radiographs and computed tomography-based 3D models in total and reversed shoulder arthroplasty patients.
Van Haver A; Heylen S; Vuylsteke K; Declercq G; Verborgt O
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Apr; 25(4):632-40. PubMed ID: 26652701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.
Lacheta L; Herbst E; Voss A; Braun S; Jungmann P; Millett PJ; Imhoff A; Martetschläger F
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Oct; 27(10):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 30725122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.
Boileau P; Cheval D; Gauci MO; Holzer N; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 29298261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty.
Scalise JJ; Codsi MJ; Bryan J; Brems JJ; Iannotti JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Nov; 90(11):2438-45. PubMed ID: 18978413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of a new method of 3-dimensional assessment of glenoid and humeral component position after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Iannotti JP; Ricchetti ET; Rodriguez EJ; Bryan JA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1413-22. PubMed ID: 23473609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional assessment of the dimensions of the osteoarthritic glenoid.
Walch G; Mesiha M; Boileau P; Edwards TB; Lévigne C; Moineau G; Young A
Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1377-82. PubMed ID: 24078535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new classification of glenoid bone loss to help plan the implantation of a glenoid component before revision arthroplasty of the shoulder.
Kocsis G; Thyagarajan DS; Fairbairn KJ; Wallace WA
Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 26920963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications.
Lowe JT; Testa EJ; Li X; Miller S; DeAngelis JP; Jawa A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Apr; 26(4):669-673. PubMed ID: 27765501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Version Correction via Eccentric Reaming Compromises Remaining Bone Quality in B2 Glenoids: A Computational Study.
Chen X; Reddy AS; Kontaxis A; Choi DS; Wright T; Dines DM; Warren RF; Berhouet J; Gulotta LV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3090-3099. PubMed ID: 28948516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation.
Chalmers PN; Salazar D; Chamberlain A; Keener JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 27592372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software.
Reid JJ; Kunkle BF; Greene AT; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 34411724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interdepartmental imaging protocol for clinically based three-dimensional computed tomography can provide accurate measurement of glenoid version.
Zale CL; Pace GI; Lewis GS; Chan J; Kim HM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1297-1305. PubMed ID: 29331571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.
Kubicka AM; Stefaniak J; Lubiatowski P; Długosz J; Dzianach M; Redman M; Piontek J; Romanowski L
Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2581-2588. PubMed ID: 27492723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability.
van de Bunt F; Pearl ML; Lee EK; Peng L; Didomenico P
Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 26201674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
