125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22964526)
1. Determinants of lymph node count in endometrial cancer surgical staging.
Cormier B; Sauthier P; Lussier C; Zang G; Mayrand MH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 22964526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lymph node counts in endometrial cancer: expectations versus reality.
Euscher ED; Bassett R; Malpica A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):913-8. PubMed ID: 21566518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging for endometrial cancer: The controversy around lymphadenectomy - Can this be resolved?
Koskas M; Rouzier R; Amant F
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):845-57. PubMed ID: 25817745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival impact of lymphadenectomy stratified by nodal metastatic probability in endometrial cancer.
Koskas M; Fournier M; Luton D; Darai E; Rouzier R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):2376-82. PubMed ID: 24590435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of lymphedema incidence between 2 lymphadenectomy techniques in patients with uterine cancer undergoing robotic staging.
Menderes G; Azodi M; Schwartz P; Silasi DA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jan; 25(1):160-5. PubMed ID: 25386859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact on survival of two different staging strategies in apparent early stage endometrial cancer comparing sentinel lymph nodes mapping algorithm and selective lymphadenectomy: An Italian retrospective analysis of two reference centers.
Buda A; Di Martino G; Restaino S; De Ponti E; Monterossi G; Giuliani D; Ercoli A; Dell'Orto F; Dinoi G; Grassi T; Scambia G; Fanfani F
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Dec; 147(3):528-534. PubMed ID: 29032824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes and analysis of disease recurrence for patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging.
Menderes G; Azodi M; Clark L; Xu X; Lu L; Ratner E; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Santin AD; Silasi DA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):1118-25. PubMed ID: 24927247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed in surgical treatment of endometrial and ovarian cancer.
Hareyama H; Ito K; Watanabe S; Hakoyama M; Uchida A; Oku K; Watanabe Y; Hayakashi Y; Hirayama E; Okuyama K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Nov; 22(9):1577-84. PubMed ID: 23060049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognosis for endometrial cancer patients treated with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy followed by platinum-based chemotherapy.
Sueoka K; Umayahara K; Abe A; Usami T; Yamamoto A; Nomura H; Matoda M; Okamoto S; Omatsu K; Kondo E; Kato K; Takeshima N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jan; 25(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25347094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical analysis on the lymph nodes metastasis characters and their relation with the prognosis of the endometrial carcinoma patients].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 46(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 21781585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of Metastatic Regional Lymph Node Locations and Predictors of Para-aortic Lymph Node Involvement in Endometrial Cancer Patients at Risk for Lymphatic Dissemination.
Altay A; Toptas T; Dogan S; Simsek T; Pestereli E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 25647255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sentinel lymph node mapping with staging lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer increases the detection of metastasis.
Holloway RW; Gupta S; Stavitzski NM; Zhu X; Takimoto EL; Gubbi A; Bigsby GE; Brudie LA; Kendrick JE; Ahmad S
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 May; 141(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 26905211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology.
Lutman CV; Havrilesky LJ; Cragun JM; Secord AA; Calingaert B; Berchuck A; Clarke-Pearson DL; Soper JT
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 16406063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Call for Surgical Nodal Staging in Women with ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO High-Intermediate Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Multicentre Cohort Analysis from the FRANCOGYN Study Group.
Ouldamer L; Bendifallah S; Body G; Canlorbe G; Touboul C; Graesslin O; Raimond E; Collinet P; Coutant C; Lavoué V; Lévêque J; Daraï E; Ballester M;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1660-1666. PubMed ID: 28058558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A quality process study of lymph node evaluation in endometrial cancer.
Forde GK; Carlson JW; Downey GO; Doss BJ; Shoemaker A; Harrison CR
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 21623200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymph node density vs. the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM nodal staging system in node-positive bladder cancer in patients undergoing extended or super-extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Lee D; Yoo S; You D; Hong B; Cho YM; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H; Ro JY; Jeong IG
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):151.e1-151.e7. PubMed ID: 28139370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
Han SS; Lee SH; Kim DH; Kim JW; Park NH; Kang SB; Song YS
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010; 89(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19916890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new diagnostic method for rapid detection of lymph node metastases using a one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay in endometrial cancer.
Nagai T; Niikura H; Okamoto S; Nakabayashi K; Matoda M; Utsunomiya H; Nagase S; Watanabe M; Takeshima N; Yaegashi N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):980-6. PubMed ID: 25190122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
