BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22964735)

  • 1. Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality.
    LaPar DJ; Kron IL; Jones DR; Stukenborg GJ; Kozower BD
    Ann Surg; 2012 Oct; 256(4):606-15. PubMed ID: 22964735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association.
    Allareddy V; Allareddy V; Konety BR
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 17592302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk.
    Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 May; 93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. PubMed ID: 22541199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgeon case volume, not institution case volume, is the primary determinant of in-hospital mortality after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    McPhee JT; Robinson WP; Eslami MH; Arous EJ; Messina LM; Schanzer A
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Mar; 53(3):591-599.e2. PubMed ID: 21144692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers.
    Christian CK; Gustafson ML; Betensky RA; Daley J; Zinner MJ
    Ann Surg; 2003 Oct; 238(4):447-55; discussion 455-7. PubMed ID: 14530717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does voluntary reporting bias hospital quality rankings?
    Ghaferi AA; Osborne NH; Dimick JB
    J Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 161(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 19932907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of in-hospital mortality among California hospitals meeting Leapfrog evidence-based standards for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Brooke BS; Perler BA; Dominici F; Makary MA; Pronovost PJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 47(6):1155-6; discussion 1163-4. PubMed ID: 18514832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Institutional factors beyond procedural volume significantly impact center variability in outcomes after orthotopic heart transplantation.
    Kilic A; Weiss ES; Yuh DD; Shah AS; Cameron DE; Baumgartner WA; Conte JV
    Ann Surg; 2012 Oct; 256(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 22964734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of surgeon volume on mortality for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Lapar DJ; Mery CM; Kozower BD; Kern JA; Kron IL; Stukenborg GJ; Ailawadi G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4):854-63. PubMed ID: 22341421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between hospital lung cancer resection volume and patient mortality risk.
    Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
    Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):1032-7. PubMed ID: 21562402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of institutional volumes on operative outcomes for aortic root replacement in North America.
    Hughes GC; Zhao Y; Rankin JS; Scarborough JE; O'Brien S; Bavaria JE; Wolfe WG; Gaca JG; Gammie JS; Shahian DM; Smith PK
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 145(1):166-70. PubMed ID: 22306215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States.
    Dimick JB; Cowan JA; Colletti LM; Upchurch GR
    Arch Surg; 2004 Feb; 139(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 14769569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.
    Birkmeyer JD; Dimick JB
    Surgery; 2004 Jun; 135(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 15179361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size.
    Dimick JB; Welch HG; Birkmeyer JD
    JAMA; 2004 Aug; 292(7):847-51. PubMed ID: 15315999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of hospital coronary artery bypass volume with processes of care, mortality, morbidity, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons composite quality score.
    Shahian DM; O'Brien SM; Normand SL; Peterson ED; Edwards FH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 139(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 20022608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Small rural hospitals and high-risk operations: how would regionalization affect surgical volume and hospital revenue?
    Chappel AR; Zuckerman RS; Finlayson SR
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):599-604. PubMed ID: 17084319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mortality after elective colon resection: the search for outcomes that define quality in surgical practice.
    Billeter AT; Polk HC; Hohmann SF; Qadan M; Fry DE; Jorden JR; McCafferty MH; Galandiuk S
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Apr; 214(4):436-43; discussion 443-4. PubMed ID: 22397975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of meeting Leapfrog volume thresholds on complication rates following complex surgical procedures.
    Allareddy V; Ward MM; Allareddy V; Konety BR
    Ann Surg; 2010 Feb; 251(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 20054271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
    Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
    Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.