These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22964880)
1. Measuring academic performance for healthcare researchers with the H index: which search tool should be used? Patel VM; Ashrafian H; Almoudaris A; Makanjuola J; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Darzi A; Athanasiou T Med Princ Pract; 2013; 22(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 22964880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The h-index outperforms other bibliometrics in the assessment of research performance in general surgery: a province-wide study. Sharma B; Boet S; Grantcharov T; Shin E; Barrowman NJ; Bould MD Surgery; 2013 Apr; 153(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23465942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bibliometric comparison of Nobel Prize laureates in physiology or medicine and chemistry. Bünemann S; Seifert R Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2024 Sep; 397(9):7169-7185. PubMed ID: 38652280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Minasny B; Hartemink AE; McBratney A; Jang HJ PeerJ; 2013; 1():e183. PubMed ID: 24167778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing. De Groote SL; Raszewski R Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancing the h index for the objective assessment of healthcare researcher performance and impact. Patel VM; Ashrafian H; Bornmann L; Mutz R; Makanjuola J; Skapinakis P; Darzi A; Athanasiou T J R Soc Med; 2013 Jan; 106(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 23358276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Effect Does Self-Citation Have on Bibliometric Measures in Academic Plastic Surgery? Swanson EW; Miller DT; Susarla SM; Lopez J; Lough DM; May JW; Redett RJ Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Sep; 77(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 26101989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Profit (p)-index: the degree to which authors profit from co-authors. Aziz NA; Rozing MP PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e59814. PubMed ID: 23573211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do Nobel Laureates Create Prize-Winning Networks? An Analysis of Collaborative Research in Physiology or Medicine. Wagner CS; Horlings E; Whetsell TA; Mattsson P; Nordqvist K PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134164. PubMed ID: 26230622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inconsistency in Automated Reports of Scientific Productivity and Impact in Academic Plastic Surgery. Plana NM; Massie JP; Bekisz JM; Fryml EM; Spore S; Diaz-Siso JR; Flores RL Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Mar; 141(3):432e-438e. PubMed ID: 29485578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment]. Cabezas-Clavijo A; Delgado-López-Cózar E Med Intensiva; 2013; 37(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 23517697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The distribution of the h-index among academic emergency physicians in the United States. DeLuca LA; St John A; Stolz U; Matheson L; Simpson A; Denninghoff KR Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 20(10):997-1003. PubMed ID: 24127702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-rater reliability of h-index scores calculated by Web of Science and Scopus for clinical epidemiology scientists. Walker B; Alavifard S; Roberts S; Lanes A; Ramsay T; Boet S Health Info Libr J; 2016 Jun; 33(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 27168256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama]. La Torre G; Sciarra I; Chiappetta M; Monteduro A Clin Ter; 2017; 168(2):e65-e71. PubMed ID: 28383616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Of Nobel class: a citation perspective on high impact research authors. Garfield E; Welljams-Dorof A Theor Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):117-35. PubMed ID: 1412072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences between h-index measures from different bibliographic sources and search engines. Barreto ML; Aragão E; Sousa LE; Santana TM; Barata RB Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Apr; 47(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24037349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of the Hirsch index in benchmarking hepatic surgery research. Cucchetti A; Mazzotti F; Pellegrini S; Cescon M; Maroni L; Ercolani G; Pinna AD Am J Surg; 2013 Oct; 206(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 23806828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do bibliometric findings differ between Medline, Google Scholar and Web of Science? Bibliometry of publications after oral presentation to the 2013 and 2014 French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA) Congresses. Villatte G; Marcheix PS; Antoni M; Devos P; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Erivan R Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1469-1473. PubMed ID: 33153959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Part II: Should the h-index be modified? An analysis of the m-quotient, contemporary h-index, authorship value, and impact factor. Khan NR; Thompson CJ; Taylor DR; Gabrick KS; Choudhri AF; Boop FR; Klimo P World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):766-74. PubMed ID: 23886815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]