272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22965266)
1. Comparison of molecular subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to local clinical subtyping in breast cancer patients.
Nguyen B; Cusumano PG; Deck K; Kerlin D; Garcia AA; Barone JL; Rivera E; Yao K; de Snoo FA; van den Akker J; Stork-Sloots L; Generali D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3257-63. PubMed ID: 22965266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular subtyping of early-stage breast cancer identifies a group of patients who do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Glück S; de Snoo F; Peeters J; Stork-Sloots L; Somlo G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 23756626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response.
de Ronde JJ; Hannemann J; Halfwerk H; Mulder L; Straver ME; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Wesseling J; van de Vijver M; Wessels LF; Rodenhuis S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19669409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of MammaPrint and TargetPrint results with clinical parameters in German patients with early stage breast cancer.
Gevensleben H; Göhring UJ; Büttner R; Heukamp LC; Kunz G; Dimpfl T; Jackisch C; Ortmann O; Albert US; Bender R; De Snoo F; Krijgsman O; Glas AM; Ergönenc YH; Vogel C; Dykgers A; Langwieder C; Rees M; Anzeneder T
Int J Mol Med; 2010 Dec; 26(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 21042777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemosensitivity and Endocrine Sensitivity in Clinical Luminal Breast Cancer Patients in the Prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST) Predicted by Molecular Subtyping.
Whitworth P; Beitsch P; Mislowsky A; Pellicane JV; Nash C; Murray M; Lee LA; Dul CL; Rotkis M; Baron P; Stork-Sloots L; de Snoo FA; Beatty J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):669-675. PubMed ID: 27770345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer.
Wesseling J; Tinterri C; Sapino A; Zanconati F; Lutke-Holzik M; Nguyen B; Deck KB; Querzoli P; Perin T; Giardina C; Seitz G; Guinebretière JM; Barone J; Dekker L; de Snoo F; Stork-Sloots L; Roepman P; Watanabe T; Cusumano P
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 27377889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells according to immunohistochemically defined molecular subtypes in advanced breast cancer.
Munzone E; Botteri E; Sandri MT; Esposito A; Adamoli L; Zorzino L; Sciandivasci A; Cassatella MC; Rotmensz N; Aurilio G; Curigliano G; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Oct; 12(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 23040002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chemosensitivity predicted by BluePrint 80-gene functional subtype and MammaPrint in the Prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST).
Whitworth P; Stork-Sloots L; de Snoo FA; Richards P; Rotkis M; Beatty J; Mislowsky A; Pellicane JV; Nguyen B; Lee L; Nash C; Gittleman M; Akbari S; Beitsch PD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3261-7. PubMed ID: 25099655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancers presenting luminal B subtype features show higher discordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Park S; Park HS; Koo JS; Yang WI; Kim SI; Park BW
Cancer; 2012 Feb; 118(4):914-23. PubMed ID: 21800290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High concordance of protein (by IHC), gene (by FISH; HER2 only), and microarray readout (by TargetPrint) of ER, PgR, and HER2: results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial.
Viale G; Slaets L; Bogaerts J; Rutgers E; Van't Veer L; Piccart-Gebhart MJ; de Snoo FA; Stork-Sloots L; Russo L; Dell'Orto P; van den Akker J; Glas A; Cardoso F;
Ann Oncol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):816-823. PubMed ID: 24667714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic profiling of breast cancer in African-American women using MammaPrint.
Nunes RA; Wray L; Mete M; Herbolsheimer P; Smith KL; Bijelic L; Boisvert ME; Swain SM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 27568021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microarray-based determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 receptor status in breast cancer.
Roepman P; Horlings HM; Krijgsman O; Kok M; Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; Bender R; Linn SC; Glas AM; van de Vijver MJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Nov; 15(22):7003-11. PubMed ID: 19887485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expression profiling of breast tumors based on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status defines migration-related genes.
Cuadros M; Cano C; López FJ; López-Castro R; Concha A
Pathobiology; 2013; 80(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22832278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry.
Park S; Koo JS; Kim MS; Park HS; Lee JS; Lee JS; Kim SI; Park BW
Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21865043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discordant expression of hormone receptors and HER2 in breast cancer. A retrospective comparison of primary tumors with paired metachronous recurrences or metastases.
Arapantoni-Dadioti P; Valavanis C; Gavressea T; Tzaida O; Trihia H; Lekka I
J BUON; 2012; 17(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 22740206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer obtained from core cut biopsies before neoadjuvant docetaxel, adriamycin, and cyclophoshamide chemotherapy correlate with routine prognostic markers and could be used to identify predictive signatures.
Rody A; Karn T; Gätje R; Kourtis K; Minckwitz G; Loibl S; Munnes M; Ruckhäberle E; Holtrich U; Kaufmann M; Ahr A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16673249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apoptosis-, proliferation, immune function-, and drug resistance- related genes in ER positive, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer.
Kolacinska A; Chalubinska J; Zawlik I; Szymanska B; Borowska-Garganisz E; Nowik M; Fendler W; Kubiak R; Pawlowska Z; Morawiec Z; Szemraj J
Neoplasma; 2012; 59(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 22489698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estrogen receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer tissue have the highest Ki-67 labeling index and EGFR expression: gene amplification does not contribute to EGFR expression.
Umemura S; Takekoshi S; Suzuki Y; Saitoh Y; Tokuda Y; Osamura RY
Oncol Rep; 2005 Aug; 14(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 16012712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male breast cancer: immunohistochemical subtypes and clinical outcome characterization.
Sánchez-Muñoz A; Román-Jobacho A; Pérez-Villa L; Sánchez-Rovira P; Miramón J; Pérez D; Sáez MI; de Luque V; Medina L; Ramírez-Tortosa CL; Vicioso L; Medina JA; Ribelles N; Alba E
Oncology; 2012; 83(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 22907070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunohistochemical versus molecular (BluePrint and MammaPrint) subtyping of breast carcinoma. Outcome results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 3-04 MINDACT trial.
Viale G; de Snoo FA; Slaets L; Bogaerts J; van 't Veer L; Rutgers EJ; Piccart-Gebhart MJ; Stork-Sloots L; Glas A; Russo L; Dell'Orto P; Tryfonidis K; Litière S; Cardoso F;
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 167(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 28929359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
